FineVerify: Scaling Test-Time Compute with Fine-Grained Self-Verification for Agentic Search
Summary
FineVerify is a self-verification framework for agentic search that decomposes questions into sub-questions, verifies sampled candidates, and selects the best one, achieving substantial accuracy improvements over baselines on multiple benchmarks, including enabling GPT-5-mini to surpass GPT-5 on BrowseComp-Plus.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/02/26, 03:36 PM
Paper page - FineVerify: Scaling Test-Time Compute with Fine-Grained Self-Verification for Agentic Search
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.00660
Abstract
FineVerify is a self-verification framework for agentic search that improves accuracy through decomposed sub-question checking and trajectory selection.
Agentic searchrequireslanguage model agentsto explore many sources and answer complex information-seeking questions. Scalingtest-time computeis a promising way to improve these agents, but current approaches can fail, because correct answers are often sparse andscore-based selectiondepends on model calibration. We propose FineVerify, afine-grained self-verificationframework that decomposes each question intocheckable sub-questions, verifiessampled candidatesagainst each sub-question, and selects the candidate with the highestaggregated score. This per-check structure turns selection into simpler local judgments and produces scores under the same explicit criteria. Across fouragentic searchbenchmarks and two models, FineVerify consistently outperforms standard scaling baselines. With only four sampled trajectories, it improves GPT-5-mini by 8.2 accuracy points and Gemini-3-flash by 5.6% on average. With 12 samples, FineVerify enables GPT-5-mini to surpass frontier GPT-5 onBrowseComp-Plus. Beyond accuracy, FineVerify produces interpretable verification traces that help audit benchmark errors, suggesting broader applications for inspectingagentic searchsystems. Code and data are available at https://github.com/XuZhao0/fineverify
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub2Add to collection
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.00660 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.00660 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.00660 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifier
AgentV-RL introduces an Agentic Verifier framework that enhances reward modeling through bidirectional verification with forward and backward agents augmented with tools, achieving 25.2% improvement over state-of-the-art ORMs. The approach addresses error propagation and grounding issues in verifiers for complex reasoning tasks through multi-turn deliberative processes combined with reinforcement learning.
VeriGate: Verifier-Gated Step-Level Supervision for GRPO
VeriGate extends GRPO with verifier-gated step-level supervision, providing fine-grained credit assignment when verifier rewards are degenerate. It achieves substantial accuracy improvements on reasoning benchmarks for 1.5B and 7B models.
Agentic Proving for Program Verification
This paper evaluates Claude Code in an agentic proving framework on the Clever benchmark for program verification, achieving over 98% success in specification generation and end-to-end verification, revealing that existing benchmarks may be insufficient for evaluating modern agentic provers.
Verifying Agentic Development at Scale (8 minute read)
Cognition's Ido Pesok shares lessons from building autonomous end-to-end testing into Devin, noting that for the first time, more Devin sessions are now triggered asynchronously than interactively, making verified-before-merge results a hard requirement rather than a nicety.
Think Twice, Act Once: Verifier-Guided Action Selection For Embodied Agents
Proposes VeGAS, a test-time framework for MLLM-based embodied agents that samples multiple candidate actions and uses a generative verifier to select the most reliable, achieving up to 36% relative improvement over CoT baselines on challenging tasks.