If you are running Qwen 3.8 Flash Next on Strix Halo, use this software for inference. It's so much faster than llama.cpp especially at high context.
Summary
A user recommends a GitHub project for faster inference of Qwen 3.8 Flash Next on Strix Halo, showing benchmark speeds that significantly outperform llama.cpp.
Similar Articles
@pupposandro: 2.5x faster than llama.cpp on Strix Halo. We just shipped DFlash + PFlash for the AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 iGPU (gfx1151, …
A new toolset (DFlash + PFlash) achieves 2.5x faster inference than llama.cpp on AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 iGPU, demonstrating significant speedups for Qwen3.6-27B with 128 GiB unified memory.
Getting Qwen3.8-27B with decent speed on my 4080 with 16Gb card
This guide explains how to configure DFlash2 speculative decoding with llama.cpp to achieve up to 1.72x faster inference for the Qwen3.8-27B model on an RTX 4080 GPU with 16GB VRAM.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at 1M context on Strix Halo: 38 tok/s decode, 18 min prefill (halogen 0.12.0)
Halogen version 0.12.0 fixes performance degradation at high context depths, showing improved decode and prefill speeds for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at 1 million tokens of context on AMD Ryzen AI Max+ hardware.
@Oluwaphilemon1: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next running at 15 tok/s on a 12GB RTX 5070 apparently wasn’t acceptable. So instead of buying a bigger G…
A user built an open-source inference engine called Strata to optimize running Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on modest hardware, achieving up to 65.1 tok/s from an initial 15 tok/s.
Running Qwen3.6 35b a3b on 8gb vram and 32gb ram ~190k context
The author shares a high-performance local inference configuration for running Qwen3.6 35B A3B on limited hardware (8GB VRAM, 32GB RAM) using a modified llama.cpp with TurboQuant support, achieving ~37-51 tok/sec with ~190k context.