Profile-Driven User Simulation via Reinforcement Learning with Hierarchical Rewards for Task-Oriented Dialogues

arXiv cs.CL Papers

Summary

The paper proposes ProfileSim, a profile-driven user simulation framework for financial marketing outbound calls, using GRPO with hierarchical rewards and jointly modeled user/business profiles to generate realistic, compliant dialogue data for task-oriented dialogue systems.

arXiv:2610.32435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Building Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems for high-value scenarios such as financial marketing requires large volumes of domain-specific dialogue data, which privacy regulations, annotation costs, and the need for expert labor make hard to obtain. User simulation offers a remedy, but existing methods target general-domain dialogue and exhibit two key limitations: insufficient modeling of domain-specific business processes and compliance constraints, and inadequate capture of the colloquial, spoken-language character of voice interactions. We propose ProfileSim, a profile-driven user simulation framework for financial marketing outbound calls. It jointly models user profiles---demographics and Big Five personality traits---and business profiles---intents reverse-engineered from real call logs---enabling fine-grained control over simulated behavior. The base model is fine-tuned on real voice dialogue data and refined by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with hierarchical rewards at the dialogue and utterance levels. Paired with a customer service agent integrating Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) constraints and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), ProfileSim achieves the highest colloquial naturalness, the strongest user profile adherence and the lowest agent score on long-tail intents among all evaluated user generators, while producing substantially shorter user utterances at comparable business compliance. The generated dialogue data is designed to support intent recognition training, agent evaluation, and rapid cold-start deployment.
Original Article

Similar Articles

@alacheng: The DeepSeek V4.1 flash 1017 update mentions a Reinforcement Learning (RL) training technique based on self-feedback. Reinforcement Learning with Self-Feedback means: during RL training, instead of relying entirely on external "ground truth" or human-annotated rewards…

X AI KOLs Timeline

The article unpacks the "Reinforcement Learning with Self-Feedback" technique mentioned in the DeepSeek V4.1 flash update, explains how it provides denser reward signals for long-horizon agent tasks that lack ground truth answers — such as "wish-based programming" — and compiles a list of 10 papers on self-feedback reinforcement learning from 2024–2026.

@NFT_Chen: This is incredible! Agent interactive RL is finally out of "engineering hell"! HarborRL open-sources a full framework enabling real coding agents to do stable RL! The hardest part of training agents with RL was never the algorithm — it was the engineering nightmares: trajectory collection, token alignment, multi-turn tool calls, policy version consistency. HarborRL solves all of them as a reproducible pipeline.

X AI KOLs Timeline

HarborRL has open-sourced a lightweight agent reinforcement learning framework that integrates model serving, trajectory generation, tool execution, verifier-based rewards, and policy updates into a reproducible pipeline. It supports flexible combinations of Qwen/GLM models × GRPO/DAPO algorithms × 200+ sandbox tasks × 40+ agent harnesses (such as Claude Code and SWE-agent).

CPT’d Qwen9B on Polish legal data. How to make it chat? IMPORTANTLY: how to make it reason? and function call in my harness? and which to do first? [D]

Reddit r/MachineLearning

A developer building a Polish legal domain model describes three stages of continued pretraining on Qwen3.5-9B-BASE and asks the community how to best use their remaining data (legal Q&A, study materials, harness conversations) to add chat ability, chain-of-thought legal reasoning, and function-calling for their in-house AI law harness — specifically where SFT versus RL fits in.