@Miles_Brundage: I'm not in the weeds enough to have a view on how much the 2x GPT-4 thing clarifies/reassures, but glad OAI quickly iss…

X AI KOLs Timeline News
ai-safety openai gpt-4 model-auditing computation-depth chain-of-thought

Summary

Miles Brundage comments on OpenAI's statement clarifying that the computation depth of frontier models like Astra is within a factor of two of GPT-4, advocating for continuous embedded auditing rather than reactive measures.

I'm not in the weeds enough to have a view on how much the 2x GPT-4 thing clarifies/reassures, but glad OAI quickly issued a statement. Would love to move towards continuous embedded auditing of things like this rather than reacting to incidents + leaks https://t.co/FtZyETPB7V
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/03/26, 12:09 PM

I’m not in the weeds enough to have a view on how much the 2x GPT-4 thing clarifies/reassures, but glad OAI quickly issued a statement.

Would love to move towards continuous embedded auditing of things like this rather than reacting to incidents + leaks https://t.co/FtZyETPB7V

Jakub Pachocki (@merettm): I want to prevent a race into unmonitorability kicked off by confused reporting. The depth of the computation graph for our present frontier models, including Astra, is within a factor of two of GPT-4.

OpenAI has worked to preserve and utilize chain-of-thought monitoring since

Similar Articles

@polynoamial: Jakub is chief scientist at @OpenAI

X AI KOLs Timeline

Jakub Pachocki, chief scientist at OpenAI, addresses concerns about unmonitorability by stating that the computation graph depth in frontier models like Astra and GPT-4 is similar, and OpenAI emphasizes chain-of-thought monitoring.

Sam Altman on what makes GPT-6/Astra potentially dangerous

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

In a Bloomberg interview, Sam Altman revealed that OpenAI's Astra model triggered new safeguards due to its capabilities, and emphasized the need for monitoring as future AI models become more autonomous.