@iamai_omni: Fable 5 is basically ASI, its self-correction ability is astonishing.
Summary
User iamai_omni praises Fable 5's self-correction ability, considering it comparable to ASI. Citing a recommendation from yibie, they point out that the Superpowers author had Fable 5 run an autoresearch loop, spending $165 to complete 25 experiments, increasing build speed by 50% and reducing token overhead by 60%, and documented failures and correction processes in detail.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/03/26, 10:42 PM
Fable 5 is like ASI — its self-correction ability is astonishing.
yibie (@yibie): Recommended article: The author of Superpowers had Fable 5 run a complete autoresearch loop — 25 experiments, $165, improving build speed by 50% and reducing token costs by 60%. But the most valuable part isn’t the numbers; it’s the full record of the experiment process: every failure, each idea proven “completely dead,” three measurement bugs corrected mid-way. This is the most complete “using Fable” record out there.
Similar Articles
@yibie: Recommend this article. The author of Superpowers ran a complete autoresearch loop with Fable 5 — 25 experiments, $165, improving build speed by 50% and reducing token costs by 60%. But the most valuable part of this article is not the result numbers; it's the complete record of the process…
Superpowers 6 is released, using Fable 5 to run 25 autonomous experiments, improving build speed by 50% and reducing token costs by 60%, with detailed records of the experimental process and lessons from failures.
@FinanceYF5: Oh my god... Fable 5 is back, and it's insanely powerful. Someone asked Fable to make a game called 'Super Smart Racing'... With just 4 prompts and $173 worth of tokens, Fable 5 created this game. (Prompts below)
Fable 5 model only used 4 prompts and $173 worth of tokens to create a game called 'Super Smart Racing', demonstrating its extremely strong generative capabilities.
@FinanceYF5: Regret not using Fable 5 before it was discontinued? He ran it for 6 days straight. 1/ Most people treat Fable 5 as a faster chat box. Someone let a Fable 5 agent run for 6 days without anyone at the helm before writing the conclusion: 90% of people only use 10% of its capabilities. It was built for 'running for days'...
A user let a Fable 5 agent run continuously for 6 days without human intervention, concluding that most people only use 10% of its capacity.
@mylifcc: Jason's comparison of real projects is well-written. Fable 5 indeed shines in complex coding tasks: almost no low-level mistakes, proactively considers edge cases, strictly adheres to the brand system, and can quickly solve tasks in a 13-year-old codebase where GPT has failed multiple times...
User @mylifcc shares their evaluation of Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol on complex coding tasks, believing that Fable 5 has high accuracy but high cost, proposes a hybrid workflow model, sparking discussion on combining model usage.
@FinanceYF5: Someone gave Fable 5 a very casual instruction — "write code to make a realistic Eiffel Tower" — and it was done in one go. The result was so good that he couldn't describe it, just saying "it understood". The tower is to real scale, built purely with code to create an open iron frame, and it also has day/night switching and a blinking light at the top. The publisher said that Fable 5's specialty is taking…
Fable 5, with just a single vague instruction "write code to create a realistic Eiffel Tower", generated a complete 3D model in one pass, including accurate proportions, open ironwork, day/night switching, and lighting effects, demonstrating its ability to understand vague instructions and get it right the first time.