@corbin_braun: the government doesn't want you to have access to powerful AI, what could possibly go wrong.
Summary
A tweet expressing skepticism about government restrictions on access to powerful AI.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/03/26, 06:32 AM
the government doesn’t want you to have access to powerful AI,
what could possibly go wrong. https://t.co/Zp3VdPgo9a
Similar Articles
@VraserX: I can accept that some AI capabilities need restrictions. But if the public gets weaker models while corporations and g…
The tweet argues that AI restrictions should not result in the public receiving weaker models while corporations and governments access powerful ones, calling for better explanations beyond safety and highlighting the political nature of access.
@brivael: OMG. If frontier AI is built by governments, we are completely fucked. Don't do that.
A tweet expressing concern that frontier AI development led by governments could be detrimental, urging against it.
@founderengineer: This is the future “they” are saying we should have. AI is too important to be arbitrarily and centrally governed by tw…
An AI developer criticizes OpenAI and Anthropic for allegedly restricting access to medical information, calling their practices equally harmful.
@0xSero: Are you worried about your right to access intelligence? - local ai - open weight models - access to US frontier All th…
A tweet warns that the right to access intelligence is at risk due to efforts to ban certain AI labs and open weight models, with Anthropic allegedly aiming to be the sole player.
@thdxr: i don't see any solution to the ai risk problem than mass accessibility to ai if they're going to be around potentially…
The tweet argues that mass accessibility to AI is necessary to mitigate AI risks, drawing an analogy with cybersecurity where relying on a majority of defenders is common practice.