@cjzafir: Models that I'm using daily: > Codex 5.5 high (fast) > Deepseek v4 pro via API > Kimi 2.6 via API Models that I am fine…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

User shares a personal list of AI models they use daily (Codex 5.5, Deepseek v4 pro, Kimi 2.6) and for fine-tuning (Qwen 3.5 variants, Gemma4 E4B, GPT-oss 20B), aiming to fine-tune Small Language Models into Expert Language Models.

Models that I'm using daily: > Codex 5.5 high (fast) > Deepseek v4 pro via API > Kimi 2.6 via API Models that I am fine tuning: > Qwen 3.5 9B > Qwen 3.5 4B (Favourite) > Qwen 3.5 2B > Gemma4 E4B > GPT-oss 20B My use case: Using SoTA LLMs to fine-tune SLMs (Small Language Models) and making them ELMs (Expert Language Models). No Claude Model these days, their session and weekly limits are ridiculous.
Original Article

Similar Articles

@yidabuilds: https://x.com/yidabuilds/status/2053409619641602286

X AI KOLs Timeline

The author conducted a comparative evaluation of four domestic AI models: DeepSeek V4, Kimi K2.6, GLM-5.1, and MiniMax M2.7. The analysis covers their strengths and weaknesses regarding cost, long-context processing, coding stability, and reasoning performance, offering specific recommendations on how to route tasks involving large document analysis, long-running background jobs, and bulk content generation.

Open source battle: GLM vs Kimi vs MiMo vs DeepSeek

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

This article tests four open-source Chinese AI models — Zhipu GLM 5.1, Moonshot Kimi K2.6, Stepfun MIMO 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V4 Pro — on programming tasks. It finds that GLM leads overall in most tasks but not absolutely; each model has its own strengths and weaknesses.