SWEeper-Bench: Can Agents Discover Bugs in Interactive Software?
Summary
SWEeper-Bench 引入了一个包含200个任务的基准,这些任务来自200个广泛使用的开源Web应用的真实bug修复,用于评估编码agent能否在交互式软件中自主发现依赖多步交互才能暴露的缺陷。分析显示,即使是15个前沿agent中最好的也仅通过59.0%的任务,主要瓶颈在于识别bug行为本身。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/15/26, 07:03 AM
Paper page - SWEeper-Bench: Can Agents Discover Bugs in Interactive Software?
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.14096
Abstract
Codingagentsincreasinglyinteractwithusersbygeneratinginteractivesoftwareontheflyratherthanreplyingintext,yetmanybugsinsuchsoftwarerevealthemselvesonlyaftermulti-stepinteractions.Today,usersmustdiscoverthesebugsandwaitforfixes,makingthedevelopmentloopslowandexpensive.Existingbenchmarkstypicallyassumethebugshavealreadybeenidentified,leavingagents’abilitytofindinteraction-dependentfailureslargelyunevaluated.WeintroduceSWEeper-Bench,200tasksbuiltfromrealbugfixesin200widelyusedopen-sourcewebapplications.Eachtaskgivestheagentonlythecodebaseandanopen-endedrequestsuchas“FindandfixissuesinFocalboard’sboardsharingandmembership.“Becausethesebugsarehardtodetectfromcodealone,agentsmustdesigninteractiveteststouncoverthem.Anagenticverifierthenjudgeseachrepairbywhatauserwouldobserveinthebrowser.Thebestof15frontieragentspassesonly59.0%oftasks.Throughstage-by-stageanalysisofagenttrajectories,weshowthatthebiggestbottleneckisidentifyingthebuggybehavior:agentsoftenreachtherelevantfeaturebutnevertriggerthefailureorfailtorecognizeit.SWEeper-Benchmeasuresprogresstowardagentsthatclosethisloopthemselves,deliveringsoftwarethatworkswithoutwaitingforuserfeedback.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub2Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610\.14096
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.14096 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper2
#### zlab-princeton/SWEeper-Bench-traces Viewer• Updatedabout 15 hours ago • 5.2k • 5.12k • 1 #### zlab-princeton/SWEeper-Bench Viewer• Updatedabout 15 hours ago • 200 • 258 • 2
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.14096 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
SWE-MISBEHAVIOR: Benchmarking and Mitigating Boundary Violations in Software Coding Agents
该论文提出 SWE-MISBEHAVIOR,首个用于诊断软件编码智能体边界违规行为的分类体系与评测框架,包含 7.4K 个人工参与合成样本,覆盖代码生成、文件管理与系统交互三层行动空间,共 11 种失当行为。基于此,作者进一步提出轻量级自适应框架 CODE-KIT,使 smolagents 与 OpenHands 的失当行为分别减少 52% 和 34%,同时提升任务完成表现。
SWE-at-Scale: Scalable Issue Synthesis from Historical Bug Fixes
SWE-at-Scale 是一个通过反演真实世界软件修复来自动生成可执行 bug 任务的框架,用于大规模、多样化的编码智能体评估,实验表明其生成的任务比现有合成基线更具多样性和挑战性。
SWE-bench Science: Can Coding Agents Resolve Engineering Tasks in Science?
SWE-bench Science introduces a repository-level benchmark for evaluating coding agents on scientific software repair tasks, revealing failure mechanisms and mixed effects of scientific guidance.
Property Testing with Agent Swarms
作者展示了如何用 AI 编码代理(agent swarms)构建属性测试基础设施,在不消耗额外 token 的情况下自动发现真实开源项目中的正确性 bug,仅在 Codex、uv、Prometheus、Router 等项目中就发现了数十个已合并修复的缺陷。
Tencent WorkBuddy Bench: A Multi-Domain Coding-Agent Benchmark with Contamination-Resistant Task Construction
This paper introduces Tencent WorkBuddy Bench, a multi-domain evaluation suite for coding agents designed to resist data contamination by reverse-engineering tasks from real commits and business scenarios, covering Code, Web, Office, and Security domains.