Are we over-indexing on intelligence and ignoring governance?
Summary
The author argues that AI agent governance is often overlooked in favor of intelligence benchmarks, and introduces an open source project SAFi to enforce runtime boundaries.
Similar Articles
Runtime Governance: The Missing Layer for AI Agents in 2026
The article discusses the need for runtime governance in AI agents to balance autonomy with compliance, introducing SAFi, an open-source framework that enforces policies in real-time and audits actions.
Building and managing AI agents in SAFi
The author introduces SAFi, an open-source runtime governance engine for AI agents, detailing its memory system (ethical, conversational, profile, project) and practical use cases like a work assistant powered by DeepSeek V4.
Is anyone actually enforcing AI governance, or just writing policies?
The article discusses the gap between documented AI governance policies and the practical enforcement of these rules within runtime AI agent workflows.
3 AM Thought: The real problem with AI agents isn’t runtime enforcement. It’s governance maintenance.
The article argues that the primary challenge for AI agents in production is not runtime enforcement but the ongoing maintenance of governance policies as agents dynamically gain new capabilities and tools, and suggests using intelligent observation to keep policies aligned.
Who decides what an AI agent is allowed to know?
The author raises concerns about who controls data access for AI agents, questioning if there are established governance architectures, and shares a repo to explore the problem.