Are we over-indexing on intelligence and ignoring governance?

Reddit r/AI_Agents News

Summary

The author argues that AI agent governance is often overlooked in favor of intelligence benchmarks, and introduces an open source project SAFi to enforce runtime boundaries.

I keep seeing new models benchmarked for how smart they are. More reasoning, more tools, more autonomy. But in practice, the hardest problems Ive run into with agents arent about intelligence. They are about boundaries. Even a well performing agent drifts over time. It finds edge cases. It does things you didnt expect. And the smarter it is, the more creatively it can go off course. Governance is the missing layer. Not a policy document locked in a drawer, but a runtime layer that enforces what the agent can and cannot do. I am working on an open source project called SAFi that addresses exactly this. Would love to hear how others are handling governance in their agent workflows. Are you using something custom? Or relying on the model provider? Curious what the community thinks.
Original Article

Similar Articles

Building and managing AI agents in SAFi

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The author introduces SAFi, an open-source runtime governance engine for AI agents, detailing its memory system (ethical, conversational, profile, project) and practical use cases like a work assistant powered by DeepSeek V4.

Who decides what an AI agent is allowed to know?

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The author raises concerns about who controls data access for AI agents, questioning if there are established governance architectures, and shares a repo to explore the problem.