@KobinFlow: Addy Osmani, current core member of Anthropic's Claude Code team and former Google Chrome engineering director, just published a long post that directly calls out a common misconception in AI coding today: you're most likely "overprompting" Claude...
Summary
Addy Osmani, a core member of Anthropic's Claude Code team, argues that developers are systematically overprompting: trimming Claude Code's system prompt by 80% caused no drop in benchmark scores. With each new model generation, the winning move is subtraction — give only the goal and a way to verify it, avoid blindly piling on multiple agents, let the model interview you in reverse to clarify requirements, and use a separate agent to review diffs.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/29/26, 06:03 PM
Addy Osmani, a core member of Anthropic’s Claude Code team and former Engineering Director of Google Chrome, just published a long article calling out a common AI coding mistake: you’re probably overprompting Claude.
The most eye-opening fact: Anthropic officially cut Claude Code’s system prompt by 80% — and model performance didn’t drop at all.
Many people are still writing prompts with the “helicopter parenting” habits they developed for older models a year or two ago, piling on more and more words. With this generation of new models like Opus 5.5, the real experts are doing less:
-
Don’t teach it how to walk — just give it two things: a one-sentence description of what the end goal is and how to verify it was done right. As long as you give it a unit test or a validation script that outputs Pass/Fail, it will grind through the loop on its own. You don’t need to babysit it step by step.
-
Don’t worship complex multi-agent architectures: A lot of people love to blindly stack subagents, but as Addy puts it bluntly — subagents don’t make things smarter; they multiply latency and your bill. In practice, a single agent with Skills often wins on both code quality and cost-efficiency against multi-agent orchestration.
-
If you don’t know how to do it, let Claude interview you backwards: When requirements are unclear, don’t force yourself to write the perfect prompt. Let Claude ask you questions until it can compile a complete requirements spec — then open a fresh session, hand it that spec, and let it get straight to work.
-
Don’t be a human code scanner: After the code is written, spin up a separate agent that hasn’t seen the chat history to review the diff and do a round of fixes. Offload all the low-level issues to the machine — save your human energy for making the final call on core business risks.
One-line takeaway: Every time the model jumps a generation, the first thing you should do isn’t frantically add more rules — it’s rush to delete code from your prompts. Slim down your prompt every few months. Don’t let old habits from handling older models hold back what the new ones can do.
Similar Articles
@seclink: Developers are shifting from "one-shot prompts" to "agentic loops"—where AI like Anthropic's Claude sets its own goals, uses tools to execute actions, observes results, and iterates until the task succeeds. Boris Chern, developer of Claude Code...
Developers are moving from one-shot prompts to an 'agentic loop' model, letting AI autonomously set goals and iteratively execute tasks using tools. Claude Code developer Boris Cherny has abandoned traditional IDEs entirely, now running hundreds of agents to monitor issues and merge PRs—even doing so from his phone.
@Mikocrypto11: Google CEO's words were blunt: “Any solo developer using Claude now has a chance to beat a 10-person Google team.” The problem is, 90% of developers using Claude daily are still starting from scratch every session…
Discusses how Claude developers lack system prompts, leading to inefficiency, and emphasizes that a good system prompt allows the AI to maintain context and memory across sessions, boosting development efficiency.
@Huahuazo: Boris Cherny, as head of Claude Code, has long said he doesn't manually write prompts—he writes automated loop programs to drive AI work. OpenClaw's creator has similar practical experience. The community calls this Loop Engineering, upgrading prompt engineering from...
Introduces the open-source project Loop Engineering, which upgrades prompt engineering into building automated loop systems, providing multiple production-grade patterns and tools, and supporting Claude Code, Codex, etc.
@sodawhite_dev: https://x.com/sodawhite_dev/status/2067413032544940062
The article analyzes Anthropic's 400,000-session report on Claude Code, pointing out that AI programming tools are changing the division of labor between humans and AI. Domain knowledge is more important than coding ability. Expert users can enable AI to perform more complex tasks, while verification and task decomposition capabilities become core competitive advantages.
@4rblaber: head of anthropic: "people get stuck trying to write the perfect line of code. stop doing that" "just tell claude what …
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei advises developers to stop manually coding and instead guide AI models like Claude with goal-driven prompts, while OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy echoes similar 'vibe coding' sentiments in a podcast, signaling a shift to AI-driven development workflows.