I got tired of AI stats articles citing each other in circles, so I traced 93 stats back to their original sources
Summary
A researcher manually traced 93 AI statistics back to their original sources, uncovering verified data on corporate investment, energy use, wage premiums, and AI-written content, and published the results with links to primary sources.
Similar Articles
Check Your Fucking Sources, People
A rant about the proliferation of fake references and AI-hallucinated data in tech articles, using examples of a false story about Swedish crows and an inflated claim about code review defect detection.
@WSInsights: The 'information sources' in the AI circle are just these 30 people. These 30 accounts power the global AI signal. Instead of reading 100 second-hand interpretations, follow 10 first-hand accounts. Skip the 100 hot takes. …
The article curates 30 influential AI accounts across seven dimensions (research, engineering, education, open source, evals, AGI, and global ecosystem), encouraging readers to follow primary sources instead of secondary hot takes.
@mdancho84: Stanford just dropped a 457 page report on AI. It's packed with data on: cost drops, efficiency, benchmarks, adoption. …
Stanford released a 457-page AI report covering cost drops, efficiency, benchmarks, and adoption. The author highlights key charts and their career implications in a Twitter thread.
Where most-used AI models come from
An analysis of the origins and sources of the most widely used AI models, exploring where they come from and what drives their adoption.
Built a broadcast dashboard monitoring AI agent developments across 21 primary sources - here's what I'm tracking and what's missing
A user describes building a broadcast dashboard that tracks AI agent developments across 21 sources including arXiv, GitHub, and Hugging Face, noting strengths and gaps in coverage.