Minebench中Train 5.2→5.5与Opus 4.6→Fable 5

我一直对这类结果的呈现方式感到有些不满，所以我自己做了这个。以下是原始链接：GPT 5.2 -> 5.5 [https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1rdw43i/gpt\_52\_versus\_gpt\_53codex\_on\_minebench/#lightbox](https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1rdw43i/gpt_52_versus_gpt_53codex_on_minebench/#lightbox) [https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1rluvdz/difference\_between\_gpt\_52\_and\_gpt\_54\_on\_minebench/#lightbox](https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1rluvdz/difference_between_gpt_52_and_gpt_54_on_minebench/#lightbox) [https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sxapqb/differences\_between\_gpt\_54\_and\_gpt\_55\_on\_minebench/#lightbox](https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sxapqb/differences_between_gpt_54_and_gpt_55_on_minebench/#lightbox) Opus 4.6 -> Fable 5 [https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sofehv/differences\_between\_opus\_46\_and\_opus\_47\_on/#lightbox](https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sofehv/differences_between_opus_46_and_opus_47_on/#lightbox) [https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1tt3f2m/differences\_between\_opus\_47\_and\_opus\_48\_on](https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1tt3f2m/differences_between_opus_47_and_opus_48_on) [https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1u35fjw/differences\_between\_claude\_opus\_48\_and\_claude/](https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1u35fjw/differences_between_claude_opus_48_and_claude/) 比较5.5与Fable 5，以下是我的评判：Train -> Fable胜出，尽管5.5为.53M方块，而Fable仅.44M方块 Spaceman -> Fable .9M方块 vs 5.5 .7M方块 Fighter Jet -> 5.5 .32M方块 vs Fable .08M方块（4.8为.13M方块） Airship -> 5.5 .6M方块 vs Fable .244M方块 Aircraft Carrier -> 5.5 .48M vs Fable .26M vs Opus .63M方块 Knight in Armor -> 5.5 .27M vs Fable .219M方块，审美上略倾向Fable Phoenix -> 5.5 .26M vs Fable .101M.. Fable以少胜多的好例子 Treehouse Village -> 5.5 500K方块 vs Fable 5 300K方块，我认为基本持平 World Tree -> Fable 1.3M方块 vs 5.5 1M方块，其他方面持平 Castle -> Fable .9M方块 vs 5.5 .5M方块，其他方面持平 Shipwreck -> Fable .7M vs 5.5 .5M方块，略倾向Fable Arcade -> Fable .3M vs 5.5 .8M，Fable以少得多的细节获胜。5.5在这里完全失准 Office Tower -> Fable .8M vs 5.5 .3M.. Fable大概获胜。我倾向于Fable，但差距很小，主要是因为Train。5.5平均细节更多，但审美上Fable似乎能以少胜多。5.5也是'较旧'的模型，所以5.6可能是更好的比较对象。