ISO: An RLVR-Native Optimization Stack
Summary
This paper studies the optimization layer for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), proposing Isospectral Optimization (ISO) — a fixed-spectrum framework that reuses base model weight spectra while optimizing input/output singular frames. ISO-Merger and ISO-AdamW achieve strong performance with fewer training steps on reasoning and coding tasks.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/22/26, 06:41 AM
Paper page - ISO: An RLVR-Native Optimization Stack
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.19331 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Reinforcementlearningwithverifiablerewards(RLVR)israpidlyadvancingthereasoningcapabilitiesoflanguagemodels,yettheoptimizationlayerthatconvertsrewardfeedbackintoweight-spaceupdatesremainspoorlyunderstood.Buildingonourprioranalysis(Zhuetal.,2025),westudythismissinglayerthroughthesingularstructureofmodelweightsandidentifyspectralinheritance:RLVRcanreusethebasemodel’sweightspectrawhileacquiringnewbehaviorthroughchangesintheassociatedinputandoutputsingularframes.WeoperationalizespectralinheritanceasIsospectralOptimization(ISO),anRLVR-native,fixed-spectrumoptimizationframeworkwithcomplementaryofflineandonlineinstantiations.Offline,ISO-Mergercombinestheframechangesofshared-basespecialistsintoasinglefixed-spectrummodel,requiringnopost-mergedata,rollouts,gradientupdates,oron-policydistillation(OPD).Itrecoverscomplementaryspecialistcapabilitiesandachievesthestrongestaggregateperformanceamongthecompareddata-freemergingmethods.Online,ISO-Optimizerappliesachosenbaseoptimizer,includingAdamWandMuon,totheframevariableswhilekeepingthebasespectrafixed.Acrossreasoningandcodingtasksrangingfrom1.5Bto8Bparameters,ISO-Optimizerimprovesaccuracyinthereportedrunsandreachesmatchedscoreswithsubstantiallyfewertrainingsteps.OnQwen3-8B-Base,AdamWreachesanaggregateaccuracyof0.495after270trainingsteps.ISO-AdamWreachesthesameaccuracyafteronly100trainingstepsandimprovesfurtherto0.509after210trainingsteps.Together,ISOoffersaconcreteanswertoRLVR’smissingoptimizationlayer:ratherthaninheritingpre-trainingoptimizationwholesale,designpost-trainingaroundthestructureofreward-drivenadaptation:inheritthespectrum,optimizetheframes.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub0Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607\.19331
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.19331 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.19331 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.19331 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Interactive Inverse Reinforcement Learning of Interaction Scenarios via Bi-level Optimization
This paper introduces Interactive Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IIRL), a framework where a learner actively interacts with an expert to infer reward functions, formulated as a stochastic bi-level optimization problem. The authors propose the BISIRL algorithm, providing convergence guarantees and experimental validation for this interactive learning paradigm.
Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards
Proposes Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization (CIPO), an extension to RLVR that converts failed trajectories into correction-oriented supervision, improving reasoning and correction performance in LLMs across math and code benchmarks.
Structured Role-Aware Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning
This paper introduces Structured Role-Aware Policy Optimization (SRPO), a method that improves multimodal reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models by assigning token-level credit based on distinct perception and reasoning roles within reinforcement learning frameworks.
Reward Granularity in RLVR: Comparing Process and Outcome Reward Structures for Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models
This paper systematically compares process and outcome reward structures for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) in small language models for mathematical reasoning. The study finds that process-only supervision significantly improves accuracy and reasoning trace fidelity over outcome-only supervision, and analyzes failure modes.
Spectral Rewiring for Exploration, Purification, and Model Merging
This paper introduces SAR, a training-free method that projects RL updates onto a compact reasoning core in spectral space, enabling purification, improved exploration, and stronger model merging.