@BenjaminDEKR: The U.S. must decide if we want to be second place to China here, or not. Choose wisely.
Summary
The tweet highlights the strategic decision facing the U.S. regarding competition with China in robotics and AI, noting that robots will soon be integral to everyday life.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/22/26, 09:27 PM
The U.S. must decide if we want to be second place to China here, or not. Choose wisely.
Dr Singularity (@Dr_Singularity): Robots are here, and soon they’ll be everywhere. Working, building, cooking, cleaning, exploring, and becoming a normal part of everyday life.
Similar Articles
US to tell partners they must pick sides in AI race with China
The United States plans to inform its partners that they must choose between the US and China in the ongoing AI technological competition.
@rohanpaul_ai: Reuters: The U.S. is getting ready to force a choice on multiple countries in the AI race against China. Nations that j…
The U.S. is preparing to force countries to choose between the U.S.-led Pax Silica initiative and China's AI framework, affecting access to AI resources and semiconductors.
What exactly are we competing with China for?
A thoughtful inquiry into the actual implications of the AI race between the US and China, questioning what practical outcomes this competition will bring and why it matters beyond technical benchmarks.
@BenjaminDEKR: If AI is so vital to America and the world's future, perhaps it's a good idea to **not** put every AI headquarters in t…
A commentator argues that concentrating nearly all major AI lab headquarters in California is risky for America's AI future, quoting roon's observation that California's governance now matters more than most countries' AI policies since only xAI is headquartered outside San Francisco among major labs.
NYT: Protect America’s lead in the A.I. race.
A critical take on a New York Times editorial that argues the US should maintain its AI lead by restricting chip sales to China, with the commenter accusing the Times of America-first bias.