@Michaelzsguo: My Deepseek V4 Pro agent (inside codex) has been pursuing goal for more than 13 hours, burning ~100M tokens, and has on…
Summary
A user reports that their Deepseek V4 Pro agent running inside Codex has been operating for over 13 hours, consuming ~100M tokens but costing only $1.85, highlighting the model's cost efficiency.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/16/26, 03:19 PM
My Deepseek V4 Pro agent (inside codex) has been pursuing goal for more than 13 hours, burning ~100M tokens, and has only costed me $1.85. Yes you saw it right. Not $185, but 1 dollar 85 cents. https://t.co/YdhzP3KHTM
Similar Articles
@cjzafir: 359M Tokens burned in 72 hours. Cost: $78~ Results: New 240M fine-tuning dataset. Process: > Codex 5.5 as Orchestrator.…
A developer used Codex 5.5 as an orchestrator and Deepseek v4 pro as an executor to generate a 240M token fine-tuning dataset, burning 359M tokens at a cost of only $78.
@NFTCPS: Guys, using DeepSeek V4 Pro to run Codex, the tokens burning a hole in your pocket? You gotta know these two skills. token-saver: after modifying code, just returns a path + done, no extra words. Tests show it saves 60-80% tokens memory…
Codex skills optimized for DeepSeek V4 Pro, saves 60-80% tokens by freezing skill files and minimal output, with cross-conversation persistent memory capability.
Deepseek V4's 1M context window: the breaking point
A detailed evaluation of Deepseek V4's 1M token context window across production codebases reveals optimal performance at 150-250k tokens, with degradation past 300k and significant latency in reasoning mode. The model exhibits high hallucination rates on unknown tasks, requiring validation layers for production use.
DeepSeek reasonix, DeepSeek native coding agent with high caching and low cost
DeepSeek releases a native coding agent called DeepSeek reasonix, featuring high caching and low cost.
DeepSeek enters the fight for token volume, Anthropic continues to dominate spend (12 minute read)
AI Gateway's May 2026 data shows DeepSeek's token share surged to 17% with minimal spend, while Anthropic retained 65% of spend, indicating cost-conscious routing and growing overall usage.