DeepSeek v4 Flash on 4090 + DDR5, my experience
Summary
A user shares their experience running the DeepSeek v4 Flash model with a 24GB GPU and DDR5 RAM, including performance numbers and tips for optimization.
Similar Articles
Deepseek V4 Flash running on RTX 5090 MoE
User shares optimization benchmarks for DeepSeek-V4-Flash (Q2_K) running on an RTX 5090 using a fork of llama.cpp, achieving 21.3 tokens/s generation and 1 million context size.
3 experiments running dsv4-flash-0731 q4+ quants on 128GB RAM + ~60 GB VRAM (with a quite bad pcie infra) with an acceptable tgs and relatively acceptable pp speed
The author conducted experiments to run DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 with 4-bit quantizations on a 128GB RAM system, using optimizations like memory mlocking and prompt processing strategies to achieve acceptable inference speeds.
Deepseek V4 flash performance on DGX Spark
A Reddit user shares their experience running DeepSeek V4 Flash on a dual-ASUS GX10 DGX Spark setup, detailing performance metrics, configuration, and power consumption, with throughput benchmarks across various context lengths.
@Snixtp: DeepSeek V4 Flash on a single RTX Pro 6000?
DeepSeek V4 Flash GGUF quantizations have been released by antirez, enabling the model to run on single GPUs like the RTX Pro 6000 and Macs with 128GB+ RAM. The quantized files are available on Hugging Face with instructions for the DS4 inference engine.
@ciruai: Testing DeepSeek v4 Flash on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Strix Halo with 128GB RAM. Getting ~15 TPS over a decently long …
Testing DeepSeek v4 Flash on the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with 128GB RAM achieves ~15 TPS for a 284B MoE model (13B active) locally, costing $3,000 versus $25,000+ for a datacenter setup, highlighting the feasibility of running large models on consumer hardware.