EviScene: Beyond "Is It AI?" for Agentic Image Factuality Assessment
Summary
该论文提出Image Factuality Assessment任务及EviScene多模态ReAct智能体,通过视觉检查、外部检索与证据分析的交替推理来判定图像所描绘场景是否事实成立,并发布了包含10,174张图像的EviLens专家审阅基准,在Qwen3.5-9B上实现了79.05%的平衡准确率。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/14/26, 10:53 AM
Paper page - EviScene: Beyond “Is It AI?” for Agentic Image Factuality Assessment
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.14609 Published on Oct 10
·
Submitted byhttps://huggingface.co/Zhengbo-Zhang
Boon Oct 14
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
DeterminingwhetheranimageisAI-generateddoesnotestablishwhetherthesituationitdepictsisfactuallysupported.WeformulateImageFactualityAssessment:givenanimageandagenericverificationinstruction,asystemreturnsasupportedorrefutedverdictwithanevidence-groundedexplanation.Withoutasuppliedtextualclaim,thesystemmustprogressivelyrefinefactualquestionsduringinvestigationandalignexternalevidencewiththespecificsituationdepicted.WeintroduceEviLens,anexpert-reviewedbenchmarkof10,174supportedandrefutedimagesfromcontrolledconstructionandwebcollection,coveringtwelvefactualerrortypesandevaluatingbothverdictaccuracyandevidencesufficiency.WedevelopEviScene,amultimodalReActagentthatinterleavesvisualinspection,externalretrieval,andevidenceanalysis,usingnewfindingstorefineitsquestionsandrevisitrelevantimagedetails.Wetrainacompactpolicywithsupervisedfine-tuningonreviewedteachertrajectories,followedbyprivilegedon-policyself-distillationappliedtoverifieddecisionsfromthepolicy’sowninvestigations.Onthe1,527-imagetestset,thetrainedQwen3.5-9Bagentachieves79.05%balancedaccuracyandaStrictEvidenceSufficiencyRate(SESR)of52.26%,improvingoverthesame-backbonebaseagentby6.71and9.37percentagepoints,respectively.ItsSESRisthehighestamongtheevaluatedagents.Code,models,anddatawillbereleasedathttps://github.com/wangzian828/EVISCENEandhttps://huggingface.co/ZiAnwang/EviScene.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610\.14609
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper1
#### ZiAnwang/EviScene Updatedabout 2 hours ago • 6
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.14609 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.14609 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
EviRover: Reinforcing Agentic Perception Beyond a Glance
EviRover reframes visual perception as an agentic process that gathers evidence beyond a single glance, training a 4B perception agent with SFT and agentic RL on newly generated datasets (EviRover-SFT-5K, EviRover-RL-12K) and a human-verified benchmark (EviLens), outperforming its backbone by 30 points and rivaling proprietary models.
Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing
该论文提出了 RISEBench 及其扩展版本 RISEBench++,这是首个评估推理驱动视觉编辑(Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing)的基准,涵盖时序、因果、空间、逻辑、反事实及混合推理等六个维度,并提出训练无关的 RISE-Agent 框架,结果显示即使是 GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst 也仅达 56.6% 准确率。
OneSearch-VL: Unified Multimodal Deep Research Agent for Image and Video
该论文提出 OneSearch-VL,一个以视觉接地证据图(VGEG)为核心的统一多模态深度研究智能体,用于单图、多图和视频研究任务,并构建了 SFT/RL 数据集及细粒度评测基准,在多个图文与视频基准上显著超越 Qwen3-VL-8B。
@sermakarevich: Agentic evals: how to know whether an AI agent did the job, and will do it again
一篇面向工程师的深度文章,系统讲解如何对 LLM 智能体进行评估:通过检查可验证的最终状态而非回复文本来判定任务是否完成,并区分能力(capability)与可靠性(reliability)两个指标,同时定位失败步骤、判断模型评审的可信度。
EAVer: Long-Form Factuality Verification as an End-to-End Agentic Policy
EAVer introduces an end-to-end agentic policy for verifying facts in long-form text by grouping claims, efficiently searching, and reusing evidence, achieving superior performance on benchmarks like VeriFastScore and FaStFact-Bench with fewer searches.