@DeRonin_: How to naturally build your own self-improving agents: a self-improving agent learns from its own mistakes and rewrites…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

A practical guide explaining three levels of building self-improving AI agents, from manual loops to automated design, with recommended tools and frameworks.

How to naturally build your own self-improving agents: a self-improving agent learns from its own mistakes and rewrites itself, not just papers setups by level: LEVEL 1: manual self-improvement loop needs: basic Python or a no-code eval tool shipping: 1 weekend basic, 1-2 weeks for real wins > 50-100 test cases for your agent's real job > define what "good" means (accuracy, format, tool calls) > LLM-as-judge scores each output 1-10 > failures feed a prompt rewrite > loop 5-10x, keep the winner tools that skip the boilerplate: Promptfoo, Inspect AI, Braintrust, LangSmith LEVEL 2: DSPy framework (Stanford NLP, open-source) needs: solid Python + 1 week to learn the framework shipping: 1-2 weeks first pipeline, 2-3 days after > declare your agent, don't hand-write prompts > auto-compiles prompts via MIPROv2 / BootstrapFewShot > handles multi-step, RAG, and tools natively > already in production at Databricks, JetBlue LEVEL 3: automated agent design (ADAS, AutoAgent, similar) needs: ML engineering background + $100-1000 compute budget shipping: 2-4 weeks of setup before meaningful improvements > the agent itself becomes the search space > spawns sandboxes, mutates architectures, reads its own failures > ADAS paper (Hu et al, 2024) beat hand-built baselines on coding, math, reasoning > AutoAgent and similar repos exist but setup is research-grade *P.S. on this level, I am going to release detailed article which will replace ML background this is what the paper builds on. it's not theoretical anymore the paper's specific contribution (co-evolving the evaluator) bolts onto ANY level: > rotate 3 judges from different models (anti-gaming) > curriculum learning: easy → hard test sets > judges generate new failing tests (adversarial gen) start at level 1, you'll learn more in one weekend of running your own loop than reading 5 more papers direct links to every tool, repo, and paper below (2nd tweet) ↓
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/29/26, 10:32 PM

How to naturally build your own self-improving agents:

a self-improving agent learns from its own mistakes and rewrites itself, not just papers

setups by level:

LEVEL 1: manual self-improvement loop

needs: basic Python or a no-code eval tool shipping: 1 weekend basic, 1-2 weeks for real wins

50-100 test cases for your agent’s real job define what “good” means (accuracy, format, tool calls) LLM-as-judge scores each output 1-10 failures feed a prompt rewrite loop 5-10x, keep the winner

tools that skip the boilerplate: Promptfoo, Inspect AI, Braintrust, LangSmith

LEVEL 2: DSPy framework (Stanford NLP, open-source)

needs: solid Python + 1 week to learn the framework shipping: 1-2 weeks first pipeline, 2-3 days after

declare your agent, don’t hand-write prompts auto-compiles prompts via MIPROv2 / BootstrapFewShot handles multi-step, RAG, and tools natively already in production at Databricks, JetBlue

LEVEL 3: automated agent design (ADAS, AutoAgent, similar)

needs: ML engineering background + $100-1000 compute budget shipping: 2-4 weeks of setup before meaningful improvements

the agent itself becomes the search space spawns sandboxes, mutates architectures, reads its own failures ADAS paper (Hu et al, 2024) beat hand-built baselines on coding, math, reasoning AutoAgent and similar repos exist but setup is research-grade

*P.S. on this level, I am going to release detailed article which will replace ML background

this is what the paper builds on. it’s not theoretical anymore

the paper’s specific contribution (co-evolving the evaluator) bolts onto ANY level:

rotate 3 judges from different models (anti-gaming) curriculum learning: easy → hard test sets judges generate new failing tests (adversarial gen)

start at level 1, you’ll learn more in one weekend of running your own loop than reading 5 more papers

direct links to every tool, repo, and paper below (2nd tweet) ↓

direct links for each level:

LEVEL 1 — eval tools:

Promptfoo → http://promptfoo.dev Inspect AI → http://inspect.aisi.org.uk Braintrust → http://braintrust.dev LangSmith → http://smith.langchain.com Anthropic eval cookbook → http://github.com/anthropics/anthropic-cookbook…

LEVEL 2 — DSPy:

docs → http://dspy.ai github → http://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy… MIPROv2 paper → http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11695

LEVEL 3 — ADAS / AutoAgent:

ADAS paper → http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08435 ADAS code → http://github.com/ShengranHu/ADAS AutoAgent → http://github.com/HKUDS/AutoAgent

bookmark this, you’ll need it

also in addition to this, prepare really detailed guide on how anybody can setup such as system even without ML background

it should be good

yeah, i live with this shit for 2 weeks already…

hopefully it’s giving to me only 3-3.5k views at the beginning

all others are organic

Similar Articles

@qinzytech: https://x.com/qinzytech/status/2066585405479371092

X AI KOLs Timeline

A technical analysis of two approaches to building self-evolving AI agents: model-based (via architecture like SSMs or transformer with fast-weight updates, and training methods) and harness-based (via memory or meta harness that can rewrite itself). The author provides practical recommendations for different audiences.