Agents' Last Exam
Summary
Introduces Agents' Last Exam (ALE), a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on long-horizon, economically valuable real-world tasks across 13 industry clusters with over 1000 tasks, revealing a large gap between benchmark performance and practical deployment.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/10/26, 12:08 AM
Paper page - Agents’ Last Exam
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.05405 Published on Jun 3
·
Submitted byhttps://huggingface.co/XinyangDavidHan
Hanon Jun 9
#2 Paper of the day Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Agents’ Last Exam (ALE) is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on long-term, economically valuable real-world tasks across 13 industry clusters with 1K+ tasks, revealing significant gaps between benchmark performance and practical deployment.
Recent AI systems have achieved strong results on a wide range ofbenchmarks, yet these gains have not translated into economically meaningful deployment across many professional domains. We argue that this gap is largely an evaluation problem: widely usedbenchmarks lack sustained performance measurement on real and economically valuable workflows. This paper introduces Agents’ Last Exam (ALE), abenchmarkdesigned to evaluateAI agentson long-horizon, economically valuable,real-world taskswith verifiable outcomes. Developed in collaboration with 250+ industry experts, ALE covers non-physical industries defined with reference toO*NET/SOC 2018(the U.S. federal occupational taxonomy). It is organized around atask taxonomywith 55 subfields grouped into 13industry clusterscovering 1K+ tasks. Current results show that the hardest tier remains far from saturated: across mainstream harness and backbone configurations, the averagefull pass rateis 2.6%. ALE is designed as aliving benchmark: its task pool grows continuously as new workflows and industries are onboarded. More broadly, ALE is intended not merely as another leaderboard, but as an instrument for closing the gap betweenbenchmarksuccess and GDP-relevant impact.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub183Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606\.05405
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05405 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05405 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05405 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
@dair_ai: // Agents' Last Exam // Agents' Last Exam is a living benchmark of over 1,000 economically valuable tasks, built with 2…
Agents' Last Exam is a living benchmark of over 1,000 economically valuable tasks designed to evaluate AI agents on real-world workflows, with a current full pass rate of only 2.6% on its hardest tier.
@dawnsongtweets: Everyone says the latest AI agents will be "job-ready" soon, especially after the release of Fable 5 this week. But is …
This article introduces Agents' Last Exam (ALE), a rolling benchmark designed to test whether AI agents can perform economically valuable work. Evaluations on frontier models like Fable 5 show 0% success on the hardest tasks, indicating that truly job-ready agents are not yet here.
@rohanpaul_ai: Today’s frontier agents are far less ready for real-world automation than their benchmark scores suggest. This paper pr…
This paper introduces Agents' Last Exam, a benchmark that tests AI agents on real expert work across 55 digital work areas. Current best agents fail most tasks, averaging only 2.6% pass rate on the hardest tier, revealing a large gap between benchmark scores and real-world automation readiness.
HealthAgentBench: A Unified Benchmark Suite of Realistic Agentic Healthcare Environments for Challenging Frontier AI Agents
This paper introduces HealthAgentBench, a suite of 54 realistic healthcare tasks for evaluating frontier AI agents. It finds that even the best agent (Codex GPT-5.5) achieves only ~42% success, highlighting substantial room for improvement.
@dair_ai: https://x.com/dair_ai/status/2066174390048358760
A curated thread covering three notable AI papers: MiniMax Sparse Attention for efficient long-context inference, Self-Harness for self-improving agent scaffolds, and Agents' Last Exam benchmark for measuring agent economic value.