@browser_use: Astra is a monster at browser use
Summary
Astra achieved 77.3% on the Browser Use Benchmark v2, far surpassing Opus 5 (50.5%) and GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh (49.1%), with 22 of 60 tasks earning full marks compared to zero for Opus 5.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/06/26, 12:50 PM
Astra is a monster at browser use
Gregor Zunic (@gregpr07): Astra just obliterated our hardest benchmark 👀
Browser Use Benchmark v2 scores are
> Astra medium: 77.3% > Opus 5: 50.5% > GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh: 49.1%
22/60 tasks got full marks. Opus 5 had zero.
(fable rejects too many)
Similar Articles
@browser_use: Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol are neck-and-neck on this!
Alexander Yue introduces a new browser-use benchmark where Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol show similar performance, emphasizing the benchmark's robust design with verified rubrics for LLM judges.
@browser_use: Browser Use Bench v2 Pareto frontier got completely redrawn today > Claude Opus 5.5: 59.4 > GPT‑6 Sol medium: 66.9 (3.5…
The Browser Use Bench v2 benchmark has updated its Pareto frontier, showcasing GPT-6 models from OpenAI outperforming and being more cost-effective than Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic.
@browser_use: Grok 4.7 just dropped. Still chasing DeepSeek Long Horizon Browser Use Benchmark v2 > GPT-6 Astra: 80.6 > DeepSeek V4.1…
Grok 4.7 has been released and shows improved performance over Grok 4.6 on the Long Horizon Browser Use Benchmark v2, but still lags significantly behind DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-6 Astra.
Every Benchmark Comparison for Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra/Sol
Opus 5.5 outperforms GPT-6 Astra and Sol in benchmark comparisons, but at a higher cost, as shown in the provided image.
@VraserX: Token for token, GPT-6 Astra doesn’t just beat Opus 5.5. It annihilates it. Astra High uses ~12k tokens per task. Opus …
A tweet speculating that GPT-6 Astra achieves 5.5× better token efficiency than Opus 5.5 (~12k vs ~66k tokens per task), and suggesting OpenAI may have a more powerful internal model still unreleased.