DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments?
Summary
This paper introduces DSAgentBench, the first benchmark for evaluating autonomous agents on complete, multi-tool data-science workflows in real computer environments. Results show that even the strongest agent (Claude-4.6-Sonnet) achieves only 56.70% task success, while open-source agents remain below 1%, revealing a substantial capability gap.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/12/26, 08:20 AM
Paper page - DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments?
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.10366
Abstract
DSAgentBench evaluates autonomous agents on complete, multi-tool data-science workflows in real computing environments and reveals major performance gaps.
Real-world data science involves long-horizon workflows that span data wrangling, exploration, modeling, visualization, and validation, and require coordinated use of tools such as notebooks, IDEs, terminals, browsers, and databases within real operating environments. Yet existing benchmarks lack real-computer interaction and do not evaluate whether agents can execute complete end-to-enddata-science workflowsin realistic computing environments, failing to capture the multi-stage, multi-tool nature of data-science practice. We introduceDSAgentBench, the first benchmark to evaluate whether agents can automate fulldata-science workflowsinside real computer environments.DSAgentBenchcontains 275 diverse tasks covering the entire data-science life-cycle, reflecting the complexity and tool coordination required in practice. Each task requires grounding decisions in intermediate outputs and coordinated tool use, and includes adeterministic evaluatorthat verifies analytical correctness, visual outputs, and model performance rather than code-only execution. Our extensive experiments with 15 closed- and open-source models show that even the strongest agent, Claude-4.6-Sonnet, achieves only 56.70% task success, while all open-source agents remain below 1%, frequently failing at tool orchestration, OS grounding, and multi-step reasoning. These results reveal a substantial capability gap between currentagentic systemsand realdata-science workflows, positioningDSAgentBenchas a foundation for developing grounded, verifiable, autonomous data-science agents. We releaseDSAgentBenchat https://github.com/vis-nlp/DSAgentBench.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub2Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608\.10366
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.10366 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.10366 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.10366 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
SaaS-Bench: Can Computer-Use Agents Leverage Real-World SaaS to Solve Professional Workflows?
SaaS-Bench is a new benchmark built on 23 deployable SaaS systems across six professional domains, containing 106 long-horizon tasks for evaluating computer-using agents. Experiments show that even the strongest models complete fewer than 4% of tasks end-to-end, highlighting significant limitations in current agent capabilities.
AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents
Introduces AgenticDataBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLM-based data agents across diverse domains with fine-grained skill-based metrics, including real-world B2B use cases and synthetic tasks.
DataSpace: Benchmarking Data Agents for Verifiable Analytics over Heterogeneous Workspaces
Introduces DataSpace, a benchmark for evaluating data agents on verifiable tabular analytics over heterogeneous workspaces, containing 410 cross-language tasks and 7,439 artifacts. Current frontier models achieve only 66.34% accuracy, indicating headroom.
Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales
Introduces SciAgentArena, a benchmark of ~200 tasks for evaluating AI agents in real scientific research. Finds agents effective for well-specified data-analysis workflows but struggle with novel insights and open-ended exploration.
@OkhayIea: Everyone's racing to build "AI scientists." So we asked a blunt question: Can today's best coding agents beat the publi…
Introduces NatureBench, a cross-disciplinary benchmark of 90 tasks from Nature papers to test AI coding agents, finding the best agent (Claude Opus 4.7) surpasses SOTA on only 17.8% of tasks and often succeeds by reducing science to supervised ML rather than genuine discovery.