@HermesWatcher: Your inbox doesn’t need another summarizer. A good Email Agent can turn incoming mail into a working queue of decisions…

Your inbox doesn’t need another summarizer.

A good Email Agent can turn incoming mail into a working queue of decisions:

› Triage new mail and surface what actually needs attention › Draft replies in your voice for review › Turn emails into tasks and actions › Track threads you’re still waiting on › Roll everything important into a daily digest

And this is where it gets personal:

› VIP contacts › Bills and receipts › Customer or vendor threads › Work vs. personal mail › Attachment handling › Different approval rules for different types of messages

The blueprint below gives you a starting structure for what it handles, the routines it can run, what it needs and remembers, the tools and skills behind it, your rules, automations, and the outputs it should produce.

Build the structure once. Then shape the agent around how you actually use email.

Brother, you got this down. I dig it. And hats off to you for running 12 companies. 🫡

Facts, set the guardrails to your preferences. Keep all communications. paused drafts until you approve 👌

These are excellent recommendations Jefferson 👌👌

Deeeem. Put Hermes to work Brotha. It will clean that right up for you. Inbox 0 coming 🙌

That’s what’s up 👌

There isn’t really one best model for the whole agent. Use a stronger model for judgment-heavy stuff like drafting replies, then cheaper models for triage, filing, extraction, and tracking. No reason to burn the best model on every step.

This is a great organizational structure 👌

1000%, most people these days have multiple inboxes all looking like war zones full of spam and all sorts of unorganized. Hermes will get that back on track and keep on top of it forever. 🙌