High VRAM local coding model — still Qwen 3.6 27B?
Summary
The user discusses their experience with Qwen 3.6 27B for local coding tasks and asks for recommendations for larger models (100B+) suitable for systems with 224GB of VRAM.
Similar Articles
Devs - you have 64gb of VRAM - which model do you use for coding?
A developer with 64GB VRAM shares their preference for an unsloth version of Qwen 3.5 122b-a10b for coding and asks the community for their recommendations.
Qwen 35B-A3B is very usable with 12GB of VRAM
A user benchmarks Qwen 35B-A3B (a 35B MoE model) on a 12GB RTX 3060, finding that 12GB VRAM is a practical sweet spot for running the model with 32k context, achieving ~47 t/s generation.
Running Qwen3.6 35b a3b on 8gb vram and 32gb ram ~190k context
The author shares a high-performance local inference configuration for running Qwen3.6 35B A3B on limited hardware (8GB VRAM, 32GB RAM) using a modified llama.cpp with TurboQuant support, achieving ~37-51 tok/sec with ~190k context.
Qwen 3.6 27B is a BEAST
A developer reports that the new 27B Qwen 3.6 model runs excellently on a 24GB VRAM laptop, passing all PySpark/Python data-transformation benchmarks and eliminating the need for cloud subscriptions.
Getting close to 100K context on 32GB VRAM with Qwen3.6-27 at Q8
A user shares their attempts and configurations to achieve up to 115K context on a Q8-quantized Qwen3.6-27B model using 32GB VRAM on an RTX 5090, with benchmark results and trade-offs between context length and kv-cache quantization.