High VRAM local coding model — still Qwen 3.6 27B?

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA News

Summary

The user discusses their experience with Qwen 3.6 27B for local coding tasks and asks for recommendations for larger models (100B+) suitable for systems with 224GB of VRAM.

I’ve been using Qwen 3.6 27B and it’s amazing. Not exactly your Opus replacement, but great for small tasks and checking work. But if you had 224GB of VRAM, would it still be your choice? Or is there something you consider better in the 100+B range (GPT-OSS, Deepseek, etc) that’s just not talked about as much because fewer people can run it? I care more about intelligence than t/s.
Original Article

Similar Articles

Qwen 35B-A3B is very usable with 12GB of VRAM

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

A user benchmarks Qwen 35B-A3B (a 35B MoE model) on a 12GB RTX 3060, finding that 12GB VRAM is a practical sweet spot for running the model with 32k context, achieving ~47 t/s generation.

Running Qwen3.6 35b a3b on 8gb vram and 32gb ram ~190k context

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

The author shares a high-performance local inference configuration for running Qwen3.6 35B A3B on limited hardware (8GB VRAM, 32GB RAM) using a modified llama.cpp with TurboQuant support, achieving ~37-51 tok/sec with ~190k context.

Qwen 3.6 27B is a BEAST

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

A developer reports that the new 27B Qwen 3.6 model runs excellently on a 24GB VRAM laptop, passing all PySpark/Python data-transformation benchmarks and eliminating the need for cloud subscriptions.

Getting close to 100K context on 32GB VRAM with Qwen3.6-27 at Q8

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

A user shares their attempts and configurations to achieve up to 115K context on a Q8-quantized Qwen3.6-27B model using 32GB VRAM on an RTX 5090, with benchmark results and trade-offs between context length and kv-cache quantization.