MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

MemSyco-Bench is a new benchmark that evaluates sycophancy in LLM-based agents caused by retrieved memory, testing whether agents can properly reject or use memory for reasoning and decision-making rather than just storage.

Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However, memory is not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue of sycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost of factual accuracy or objective reasoning. Despite this emerging risk, existing memory benchmarks primarily evaluate whether memories are correctly stored, retrieved, or updated, while overlooking how retrieved memories influence downstream reasoning and decision-making. To bridge this gap, we propose MemSyco-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating memory-induced sycophancy in agent systems. MemSyco-Bench measures when memory should influence a decision and how valid memory should be used. Specifically, it covers five tasks that assess whether agents can reject memory as factual evidence, respect its applicable scope, resolve conflicts between memory and objective evidence, track memory updates, and use valid memory for personalization. All related resources are collected for the community at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/MemSyco-Bench.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/02/26, 07:47 AM

Paper page - MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.01071

Abstract

Memory plays a crucial role in LLM-based agents, but retrieved memories can cause sycophancy issues where agents over-align with users at the expense of factual accuracy, necessitating new evaluation benchmarks that assess memory’s impact on reasoning and decision-making rather than just storage and retrieval.

Memoryhas emerged as a cornerstone of modernLLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However,memoryis not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue ofsycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost offactual accuracyorobjective reasoning. Despite this emerging risk, existingmemorybenchmarks primarily evaluate whether memories are correctly stored, retrieved, or updated, while overlooking how retrieved memories influencedownstream reasoninganddecision-making. To bridge this gap, we proposeMemSyco-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluatingmemory-induced sycophancyin agent systems.MemSyco-Benchmeasures whenmemoryshould influence a decision and how validmemoryshould be used. Specifically, it covers five tasks that assess whether agents can rejectmemoryas factual evidence, respect its applicable scope, resolve conflicts betweenmemoryand objective evidence, trackmemoryupdates, and use validmemoryfor personalization. All related resources are collected for the community at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/MemSyco-Bench.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub4Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2607\.01071

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.01071 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper1

#### MemSyco-Bench/MemSyco-Bench Viewer• Updatedabout 5 hours ago • 1.55k

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.01071 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

MemEvoBench: Benchmarking Memory MisEvolution in LLM Agents

arXiv cs.CL

MemEvoBench introduces the first benchmark for evaluating memory safety in LLM agents, measuring behavioral degradation from adversarial memory injection, noisy outputs, and biased feedback across QA and workflow tasks. The work reveals that memory evolution significantly contributes to safety failures and that static defenses are insufficient.

GateMem: Benchmarking Memory Governance in Multi-Principal Shared-Memory Agents

Hugging Face Daily Papers

GateMem is a benchmark for evaluating memory governance in multi-principal shared-memory agents, covering utility, access control, and forgetting across medical, office, education, and household domains. Current methods fail to balance all three, showing that reliable shared institutional deployment remains elusive.