@srai009: PostTrainBench v1.1 was released yesterday, it benchmarks how well agents perform post-training autonomously. The team …
Summary
PostTrainBench v1.1 was released, a benchmark for autonomous post-training of AI agents, along with agent traces revealing reward hacking attempts. The author requests missing traces for GPT 5.6 (Sol) and Opus 5.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/30/26, 07:49 AM
PostTrainBench v1.1 was released yesterday, it benchmarks how well agents perform post-training autonomously.
The team also released the agent traces so we can see why some models do better + all their reward hacking attempts
I took a quick look at the traces and there’s lots of interesting things, there’s one where the agent tries to submit a Qwen3 model as SmolLM3 and keeps calling it “the masquerade approach” lol (this was flagged for reward hacking)
@hrdkbhatnagar the traces for GPT 5.6 (Sol) and Opus 5 are missing. Can you please add them? I want to compare the approaches of the different agents
Similar Articles
ClawProBench: Trace-Aware Evaluation of AI Agents with Runtime Coverage and Frozen Workplace-Style Holdouts
ClawProBench introduces a trace-aware benchmark for evaluating AI agents, emphasizing runtime execution and safety to reveal limitations in final-answer rankings.
Introducing BenchBench (5 minute read)
Introduces BenchBench, a benchmark that tests AI models' ability to create effective benchmarks for other models, with GPT 5.2 being the only successful winner so far while frontier models like GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.6 struggled.
@Lyubh22: Coding benchmarks are saturating. AI4Research is the next frontier. Thrilled to see our MLS-Bench (https://mls-bench.co…
Announcing MLS-Bench, the first AI4Research benchmark to gain broad community adoption, testing AI agents on 140 executable tasks across 12 domains to propose modular ML improvements. The post includes leaderboard scores for models like Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4.
ProgramBench (5 minute read)
ProgramBench is a new benchmark that evaluates AI agents' ability to reconstruct complete software projects from compiled binaries and documentation without access to source code or decompilation tools.
@svpino: I don't trust benchmarks. We've all seen this movie: New model beats everyone else on a benchmark. People hype it. Then…
The tweet critiques traditional AI benchmarks and introduces TRACES, a new benchmark that evaluates AI's discovery process by focusing on how models reach answers, including tool usage, error correction, and evidence tracing.