Transformer Models for Text Summarization: A Comparative Study of BART, BERT, and RoBERTa

arXiv cs.CL Papers

Summary

A comparative study of BART, BERT, and RoBERTa for text summarization, examining their architectures and suitability for extractive and abstractive summarization tasks.

arXiv:2608.19200v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text summarization refers to the task of condensing a document into a shorter version while preserving its key information. Automatic text summarization (ATS), driven by advancements in natural language processing (NLP), has developed rapidly in recent years. ATS methods are commonly categorized by input type (such as single-document or multi-document summarization) and by output type (extractive, abstractive, and hybrid). This article presents a focused review of modern summarization techniques with an emphasis on transformer based models and large language models (LLMs), specifically BERT, RoBERTa and BART. It examines their architectures, pretraining strategies, and their suitability for extractive and abstractive summarization tasks.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/21/26, 09:56 AM

# Transformer Models for Text Summarization: A Comparative Study of BART, BERT, and RoBERTa
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19200](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19200)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.19200)

> Abstract:Text summarization refers to the task of condensing a document into a shorter version while preserving its key information\. Automatic text summarization \(ATS\), driven by advancements in natural language processing \(NLP\), has developed rapidly in recent years\. ATS methods are commonly categorized by input type \(such as single\-document or multi\-document summarization\) and by output type \(extractive, abstractive, and hybrid\)\. This article presents a focused review of modern summarization techniques with an emphasis on transformer based models and large language models \(LLMs\), specifically BERT, RoBERTa and BART\. It examines their architectures, pretraining strategies, and their suitability for extractive and abstractive summarization tasks\.

## Submission history

From: Vinayak Elangovan \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/a408dfef/2608.19200)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 2 Jun 2026 19:49:08 UTC \(333 KB\)

Similar Articles

Abstractiveness Metrics for Evaluating Text Summarization: A Refined Formulation with Empirical Validation

arXiv cs.CL

This paper introduces Reference Abstraction (RA), Summary Abstraction (SA), and Abstraction Ratio (AR) metrics to quantify abstractiveness in text summarization, using harmonic mean of document lengths and cubic non-overlap factor. Empirical evaluation on XSUM with four models shows the metrics effectively discriminate between extractive and abstractive summaries, and flag potential hallucination.