PaperFlow: Profiling, Recommending, and Adapting Across Daily Paper Streams

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

PaperFlow is a framework for scientific paper recommendation that processes user profiles, daily paper streams, and interest drift through three stages: profiling, recommending, and adapting, evaluated on a longitudinal benchmark with 24 users and 50 daily streams.

Scientific paper recommendation is typically evaluated as static ranking over a fixed candidate set, yet real scientific reading unfolds as a daily, longitudinal process in which interests shift and feedback accumulates. We introduce PaperFlow, a framework that organizes it into three coupled stages: Profiling, which constructs and maintains a structured, inspectable scholarly profile from heterogeneous cold-start evidence; Recommending, which ranks each date-specific paper stream through multi-signal aggregation under a fixed display budget; and Adapting, which updates user state from semantically distinct feedback signals and models interest drift across days. We further define a longitudinal user-day benchmark that fixes users, dates, candidate pools, visible inputs, and hidden simulated relevance labels under a shared temporal information boundary. The benchmark contains 24 simulated research users, 50 daily paper streams, 1,200 user-day episodes, 20,727 unique papers, and 497,448 episode-paper records. We additionally specify a blind human-evaluation protocol to validate alignment between automatic metrics and expert judgments. Experiments against five scientific recommendation baselines show that PaperFlow achieves the strongest oracle-based ranking, the highest behavioral alignment with simulated reading selections, and the best blind human-evaluation score.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/08/26, 07:14 AM

Paper page - PaperFlow: Profiling, Recommending, and Adapting Across Daily Paper Streams

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.07454 Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

PaperFlow is a framework for scientific paper recommendation that processes user profiles, daily paper streams, and interest drift through three stages: profiling, recommending, and adapting, using a longitudinal benchmark with 24 users, 50 daily streams, and 1,200 episodes.

Scientific paper recommendationis typically evaluated as static ranking over a fixed candidate set, yet real scientific reading unfolds as a daily,longitudinal processin which interests shift and feedback accumulates. We introduce PaperFlow, a framework that organizes it into three coupled stages: Profiling, which constructs and maintains a structured, inspectable scholarly profile from heterogeneous cold-start evidence; Recommending, which ranks each date-specific paper stream throughmulti-signal aggregationunder a fixed display budget; and Adapting, which updates user state from semantically distinct feedback signals and modelsinterest driftacross days. We further define a longitudinaluser-day benchmarkthat fixes users, dates, candidate pools, visible inputs, and hidden simulated relevance labels under a sharedtemporal information boundary. The benchmark contains 24 simulated research users, 50 daily paper streams, 1,200 user-day episodes, 20,727 unique papers, and 497,448 episode-paper records. We additionally specify a blind human-evaluation protocol to validate alignment between automatic metrics and expert judgments. Experiments against five scientific recommendation baselines show that PaperFlow achieves the strongestoracle-based ranking, the highestbehavioral alignmentwith simulated reading selections, and the best blind human-evaluation score.

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub4Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2606\.07454

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07454 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07454 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07454 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Flow-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Flow Matching Models

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Flow-OPD is a research paper introducing a two-stage on-policy distillation framework for Flow Matching text-to-image models, significantly improving generation quality and alignment metrics using Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium.