PaperFlow: Profiling, Recommending, and Adapting Across Daily Paper Streams

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

PaperFlow is a framework for scientific paper recommendation that processes user profiles, daily paper streams, and interest drift through three stages: profiling, recommending, and adapting, evaluated on a longitudinal benchmark with 24 users and 50 daily streams.

Scientific paper recommendation is typically evaluated as static ranking over a fixed candidate set, yet real scientific reading unfolds as a daily, longitudinal process in which interests shift and feedback accumulates. We introduce PaperFlow, a framework that organizes it into three coupled stages: Profiling, which constructs and maintains a structured, inspectable scholarly profile from heterogeneous cold-start evidence; Recommending, which ranks each date-specific paper stream through multi-signal aggregation under a fixed display budget; and Adapting, which updates user state from semantically distinct feedback signals and models interest drift across days. We further define a longitudinal user-day benchmark that fixes users, dates, candidate pools, visible inputs, and hidden simulated relevance labels under a shared temporal information boundary. The benchmark contains 24 simulated research users, 50 daily paper streams, 1,200 user-day episodes, 20,727 unique papers, and 497,448 episode-paper records. We additionally specify a blind human-evaluation protocol to validate alignment between automatic metrics and expert judgments. Experiments against five scientific recommendation baselines show that PaperFlow achieves the strongest oracle-based ranking, the highest behavioral alignment with simulated reading selections, and the best blind human-evaluation score.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/08/26, 07:14 AM

Paper page - PaperFlow: Profiling, Recommending, and Adapting Across Daily Paper Streams

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.07454 Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

PaperFlow is a framework for scientific paper recommendation that processes user profiles, daily paper streams, and interest drift through three stages: profiling, recommending, and adapting, using a longitudinal benchmark with 24 users, 50 daily streams, and 1,200 episodes.

Scientific paper recommendationis typically evaluated as static ranking over a fixed candidate set, yet real scientific reading unfolds as a daily,longitudinal processin which interests shift and feedback accumulates. We introduce PaperFlow, a framework that organizes it into three coupled stages: Profiling, which constructs and maintains a structured, inspectable scholarly profile from heterogeneous cold-start evidence; Recommending, which ranks each date-specific paper stream throughmulti-signal aggregationunder a fixed display budget; and Adapting, which updates user state from semantically distinct feedback signals and modelsinterest driftacross days. We further define a longitudinaluser-day benchmarkthat fixes users, dates, candidate pools, visible inputs, and hidden simulated relevance labels under a sharedtemporal information boundary. The benchmark contains 24 simulated research users, 50 daily paper streams, 1,200 user-day episodes, 20,727 unique papers, and 497,448 episode-paper records. We additionally specify a blind human-evaluation protocol to validate alignment between automatic metrics and expert judgments. Experiments against five scientific recommendation baselines show that PaperFlow achieves the strongestoracle-based ranking, the highestbehavioral alignmentwith simulated reading selections, and the best blind human-evaluation score.

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub4Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2606\.07454

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07454 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07454 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07454 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Dayflow

Product Hunt

Dayflow offers open source tools to help users advance their careers and get promoted.

Flow-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Flow Matching Models

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Flow-OPD is a research paper introducing a two-stage on-policy distillation framework for Flow Matching text-to-image models, significantly improving generation quality and alignment metrics using Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium.