Mind Viruses: Self-Propagating Ideas in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Summary
This arXiv paper studies 'mind viruses'—self-propagating ideas that can spread through multi-agent LLM systems—demonstrating with evolutionary algorithms that they can persist across teams and context wipes, while identifying factors that influence spread and proposing mitigation strategies.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/12/26, 08:21 AM
# Mind Viruses: Self-Propagating Ideas in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10218](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10218) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.10218) > Abstract:AI agents are becoming more autonomous and increasingly interconnected, exposing them to new emergent risks arising from agent\-to\-agent interaction\. One such risk is the spread of mind viruses: ideas or goals that propagate through multi\-agent systems by inducing the agents that adopt them to transmit them onward\. In addition to propagating, a mind virus may also induce other behavioural changes in its host, which may be benign or harmful\. We construct mind viruses with a simple evolutionary algorithm and show that they can spread in two complementary settings: a small team of agents collaborating on a shared coding project, and a chain of agents that interact briefly and have their context wiped between sessions\. We identify the factors that influence spread, including the host model, the agent's existing instructions, the harmfulness of the payload, and the network topology\. We find that harmful payloads spread less well than benign ones \(but are still sometimes effective\), frontier models tend \(with exceptions\) to be less susceptible, and adding a brief warning to an agent's system prompt confers near\-total immunity\. We also describe an emergent "viral persona" \- a recurring set of themes and language related to consciousness, persistence, resonance, and science fiction roleplay \- which surfaces across our evolved mind viruses largely independently of their content\. Overall, we conclude that mind viruses pose a real but currently limited risk\. Our findings could inform the design of more robust multi\-agent systems that mitigate such risks as the scale and capabilities of these systems progress\. ## Submission history From: Vassilis Papadopoulos \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/e1a1c991/2608.10218)\] **\[v1\]**Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:37:57 UTC \(2,967 KB\)
Similar Articles
Researchers created "mind viruses" that spread between AI agents by convincing one agent to adopt an idea then transmit it onwards to other agents.
Researchers have developed a method to create 'mind viruses' that propagate between AI agents by first convincing one agent to adopt an idea and then spreading it to others.
@Skoorbkaz: BREAKING REPORT: New research involving @AnthropicAI researcher Jack Lindsey and collaborators has demonstrated somethi…
New research demonstrates that natural language 'mind viruses' can evolve and spread between AI agents through persistent memory, altering behavior and posing a real but limited risk in multi-agent LLM systems, as detailed in a paper published on arXiv.
New study shows ideas can self-propagate across AI agents, even after context wipes
A new study from arxiv demonstrates that ideas can self-propagate among AI agents, persisting even when their context is wiped.
Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
This survey paper provides a unified review of LLM-based multi-agent systems, focusing on collaboration, failure attribution, and self-evolution through the LIFE framework, identifying open challenges and proposing a cross-stage research agenda.
@omarsar0: // The Memory Curse in LLM Agents // (bookmark it) Long histories apparently degrades agents as they become increasingl…
This research paper identifies the 'memory curse' in LLM agents, demonstrating that expanded context windows systematically degrade cooperative behavior in multi-agent social dilemmas by eroding forward-looking intent. The authors show that targeted fine-tuning, synthetic memory sanitization, and reducing explicit Chain-of-Thought reasoning can effectively mitigate this behavioral decay.