@trq212: this should be a huge update in your model of software engineering: rewrites can be good, cheap and fast of course most…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

A tweet arguing that software rewrites can be good, cheap, and fast, especially as AI models improve at filling testing and verification gaps.

this should be a huge update in your model of software engineering: rewrites can be good, cheap and fast of course most apps are not as testable and verifiable as Bun, but the models will continue to get better at filling those gaps
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/09/26, 09:52 PM

this should be a huge update in your model of software engineering: rewrites can be good, cheap and fast

of course most apps are not as testable and verifiable as Bun, but the models will continue to get better at filling those gaps

Similar Articles

AI changes the economics of software rewrites

Hacker News Top

The article argues that AI's coding effectiveness depends on codebase consistency, making rewrites economically viable to align codebases with AI's strengths, thereby improving output quality and speed.

@saranormous: https://x.com/saranormous/status/2064510215056400652

X AI KOLs Following

Despite rapid advances in AI coding agents like Devin, which have dramatically increased code writing and shipping, the article argues that the most valuable aspects of software engineering remain illegible to benchmarks and require human judgement and organizational coordination that cannot be easily automated.

@garrytan: https://x.com/garrytan/status/2054064931515855118

X AI KOLs Following

Garry Tan argues that AI coding agents like Claude Code and Codex have changed software engineering by making high test coverage affordable, creating a 'complexity ratchet' that ensures code quality improves over time without sacrificing speed.