Trump administration takes Musk’s side in fight over EU tech rules

Ars Technica News

Summary

The Trump administration criticizes EU tech regulations and supports Elon Musk in disputes over fines imposed on X under the Digital Services Act. The EU is also investigating X's integration of its AI chatbot Grok for potential breaches.

<p>The Trump administration is seeking to join Elon Musk’s appeal against a €120 million EU fine of the billionaire’s social media platform X, the latest escalation in the transatlantic clash over Brussels’ efforts to rein in US tech companies.</p> <p>The US Department of Justice on Thursday filed an application to intervene in a pair of cases brought by Musk and X seeking annulment of the penalty, which will be heard at the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg.</p> <p>“The European Commission inappropriately attempted to expand its regulatory authority to reach American companies not present or operating within its jurisdiction,” assistant attorney general Brett Shumate said.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/trump-administration-takes-musks-side-in-fight-over-eu-tech-rules/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/trump-administration-takes-musks-side-in-fight-over-eu-tech-rules/#comments">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/25/26, 10:16 PM

# Trump administration takes Musk’s side in fight over EU tech rules Source: [https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/trump-administration-takes-musks-side-in-fight-over-eu-tech-rules/](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/09/trump-administration-takes-musks-side-in-fight-over-eu-tech-rules/) Several senior figures of the administration, including US vice\-president JD Vance, have criticised the EU’s fining X\. Musk is one of the largest donors to President Trump and his favoured Republican candidates ahead of the midterm elections\. In its statement, the DOJ said the DSA had improperly “extended legal scrutiny to Mr Musk himself as a private individual and implicated entirely separate and unrelated American corporate entities under his ownership The DOJ also asserted that the Commission inappropriately calculated the fine based on the combined global annual revenue of other companies that Musk controlled, rather than what X earned within its jurisdiction\. In March 2025, X was first merged with Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI, which was subsequently acquired by his rocket maker SpaceX ahead of its public listing in June this year\. SpaceX declined to comment\. Separately, the EU is investigating X for other potential breaches under the DSA, including whether the company has assessed and mitigated risks associated with the integration of its AI chatbot Grok into X for EU users\. Apple is also appealing a €500 million fine imposed under the EU’s related Digital Markets Act for anti\-competitive behaviour in its app store\. Trump has railed against the penalties, calling them “overseas extortion” and called them a “form of taxation\.” During his first administration, the president unsuccessfully tried to influence Apple’s challenge against a €13 billion Irish tax bill\. *[© 2026 The Financial Times Ltd](https://www.ft.com/)\.[All rights reserved](https://www.ft.com/)Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way\.*

Similar Articles

Trump admin tries to block Clean Air Act lawsuit over xAI's gas turbines

Ars Technica

The Trump administration is intervening in a Clean Air Act lawsuit against Elon Musk's xAI, arguing that shutting down unpermitted gas turbines powering a data center would threaten AI innovation and national security because Grok is used by the military for targeting operations.

Elon Musk tries again to escape FTC audits of X data handling

Ars Technica

Elon Musk is petitioning the FTC to set aside a 20-year data-privacy consent order imposed on Twitter, arguing that the platform no longer exists after X merged into xAI and then into SpaceX. Critics and public commenters are urging the FTC to reject Musk's attempt to escape ongoing audits and compliance requirements.