π-Bench: Evaluating Proactive Personal Assistant Agents in Long-Horizon Workflows
Summary
π-Bench is a new benchmark comprising 100 multi-turn tasks with hidden user intents across 5 domain-specific user personas, designed to evaluate proactive assistance in long-horizon workflows for personal assistant agents.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/22/26, 02:24 AM
Paper page - π-Bench: Evaluating Proactive Personal Assistant Agents in Long-Horizon Workflows
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.14678 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Proactive assistance in personal agent systems requires identifying hidden user intents through sustained multi-turn interactions, which current benchmarks fail to adequately evaluate.
The rise ofpersonal assistant agents, e.g., OpenClaw, highlights the growing potential oflarge language modelsto support users across everyday life and work. A core challenge in these settings isproactive assistance, since users often begin with underspecified requests and leave important needs, constraints, or preferences unstated. However, existing benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can identify and act on such hidden intents before they are explicitly stated, especially in sustainedmulti-turn interactionswhere user needs emerge gradually. To address this gap, we introduce π-Bench, a benchmark forproactive assistancecomprising 100 multi-turn tasks across 5domain-specific user personas. By incorporating hiddenuser intents, inter-task dependencies, and cross-session continuity, π-Bench evaluates agents’ ability to anticipate and address user needs over extended interactions, jointly measuringproactivityandtask completioninlong-horizon trajectoriesthat better reflect real-world use. Experiments show (1)proactive assistanceremains challenging, (2) a clear distinction betweentask completionandproactivity, and (3) the value of prior interaction for proactive intent resolution in later tasks.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub7Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605\.14678
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.14678 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.14678 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.14678 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Is there a GLM 5.3 Flash Antirez/DS4 GGUF targeted at 192 GB RAM?
The author asks whether a GLM 5.3 Flash Antirez/DS4 GGUF model around 192 GB RAM exists and seeks advice on creating such a model.
XHToken/Spark-X2.5-4B VS inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny VS Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.2-3B
The article asks users which small AI models are most useful and mentions three competing models in the same size class.
I made a custom llama.cpp build optimized for 7900xtx (one or two). for qwen 3.8 next and 27B. includes optimizations for PciE x4 and tensor parallel. read inside! (no AI slop)
I found a lot of room on the table for these cards so I decided to make a specialized build to squeeze all I could. first The results: qwen 3.8 next Q3_K_XL: 920tk/s pp8192 (2 cards, ram offload), 24/27 tk/s on prose, 40+ tk/s on code with MTP but without MoE expert cache (which IS included if yuo want, read below) qwen 3.8 27B Q8_0: 1600 tk/s pp8192, 60/65 tk/s prose, 100+ tk/s code, tensor parallel. this is measured with ONE CARD BEHIND the chipset on X4. with cards on a good PciE x8 on cpu I
We have a year to fix security everywhere
The article discusses the release of GLM 5.3-flash, an open-weight AI model that is cheap and capable, raising concerns about potential misuse for hacking. It calls for urgent action to fix security vulnerabilities across the tech industry using frontier LLMs.
I reduced image-processing token usage by ~95% compared with GPT-4o direct vision, while maintaining roughly the same accuracy.How significant is that?[P]
A researcher shares preliminary results demonstrating a method that reduces image-processing token usage by approximately 95% compared to GPT-4o while maintaining similar accuracy, and seeks feedback on its significance.