Muse Wonder 1.0 Benchmarks
Summary
Meta's Muse Wonder 1.0, described as a Fable Class Model, is benchmarked in a shared comparison chart.
Similar Articles
Meta releases its first frontier model, Muse Wonder
Meta's Superintelligence Lab released its first frontier models, Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, claiming benchmark performance comparable to Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra, with a special emphasis on long-term 'active memory' and strong MemoryBench results.
BridgeMind On Muse Wonder: I've Never Seen A Model This Benchmaxxed In My Life
A critique of Meta's Muse Wonder model, arguing it is heavily 'benchmaxxed' — tuned to top key benchmarks but performing poorly on real-world tests like the BridgeBench lava lamp task, and falling short of frontier capabilities.
Muse wonder surpassed fable 5.1 on artificial analysis dashboard
Muse reportedly surpassed Fable 5.1 on the Artificial Analysis leaderboard, indicating a notable model ranking shift on the benchmark dashboard.
Muse Wonder (high) scores 93.4 on the Extended NYT Connections Benchmark, ahead of Muse Spark 1.3 (high) at 85.1. It's among the most expensive models tested.
Muse Wonder (high) achieves 93.4 on the Extended NYT Connections Benchmark, surpassing Muse Spark 1.3 (high) at 85.1, though it ranks among the most expensive models tested.
Muse Wonder
Meta 今日发布 Muse Wonder 系列前沿模型（Muse Wonder 与 Muse Wonder Full），主打个人与专业智能体任务，具备 Active Memory 与 Active Focus 能力，已在编程、法律、金融等领域基准测试中达到领先水平，将通过 Meta Model API 和 Muse Code 提供服务。