Note on 24th September 2026
Summary
Simon Willison notes that coding agents, while powerful, add complexity to software engineering, requiring significant discipline and knowledge to unlock their full potential.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/25/26, 03:42 PM
Similar Articles
@simonw: The more time I spend working with coding agents, the more convinced I am that they make software engineering even hard…
The author argues that coding agents, despite their capabilities, make software engineering more challenging and require extraordinary discipline, referencing recent AI models like Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.2 in the discussion.
@levie: The world is going to be using coding agents for far more than anyone would have thought before. We’ll be building tool…
The author predicts that coding agents will be extensively used across various fields, reducing software costs and increasing engineer leverage, leading to more software applications and a greater demand for engineers.
@saranormous: https://x.com/saranormous/status/2064510215056400652
Despite rapid advances in AI coding agents like Devin, which have dramatically increased code writing and shipping, the article argues that the most valuable aspects of software engineering remain illegible to benchmarks and require human judgement and organizational coordination that cannot be easily automated.
@MaximeRivest: Coding agents can only accelerate our work when we are willing to accept that we may not fully understand the overly co…
The article discusses how AI coding agents require engineers to accept that they may not fully understand the complex systems created, drawing parallels to other fields like natural resource management.
Why write code in 2026
Argues that despite AI coding agents, humans still benefit from writing code for better understanding, ownership, and maintaining software quality.