Follow up on my "is AI prompting basically solo mode at work" post

Following up on my "is AI prompting basically solo mode at work" post — thank you all, seriously A couple days ago I asked if anyone else's team was annoyed that AI prompting is basically single-player, even when the whole team's using it daily. Got way more responses than I expected, and a few things came up again and again: Shared docs/wikis for prompts almost always die within days, because they need someone to remember to update them The prompt itself usually isn't the valuable part — it's the context and history behind it A few of you have hacked together git repos or Claude/GPT plugins to sync prompts across your team, because nothing off-the-shelf really does this well Based on all of that, I've been building something: a shared workspace where your whole team prompts the same AI together, instead of everyone working solo. Everyone in the workspace sees the same prompts and responses as they happen — no copy-pasting into a doc, no "hey can you send me that prompt." Context and history stick to the workspace automatically, so nobody has to remember to save or document anything for it to be there for the next person, and a new team member joining an existing workspace inherits the full history instead of starting from zero. I'm not live yet, but I'm getting close. If this sounds like something you'd actually want to test when it's ready, drop a comment or send me a DM — I'm looking for a small group of real teams to test with first, and early testers will get priority access plus a discounted rate when we launch. Full disclosure — I am building this to actually sell, not just as a side project. But I'd rather find out now, from people who described this exact pain, whether it's worth finishing than build for months and find out later it doesn't solve a real problem. If you want in as an early tester, comment or DM me — and if it's not for you, I'd still genuinely appreciate the honest "this wouldn't help me" too.