PNAS: Over Half of All Academic Articles Now Show LLM Influence—7.3M-Paper Study [R]

Reddit r/MachineLearning Papers

Summary

This PNAS study of 7.3 million academic papers finds that by 2025, over half show LLM influence, with significant inequality in adoption across lower-prestige and non-English institutions.

Largest empirical study of AI penetration in academic publishing ever conducted—51%-by-2025 is the most authoritative quantitative marker yet of how thoroughly LLMs have reshaped scientific writing, and the inequality angle (adoption skews lower-prestige and non-English institutions) is a fresh policy dimension. --- Source: https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2605754123
Original Article

Similar Articles

Content for Content’s Sake

Armin Ronacher

The author investigates how LLMs are influencing word usage in coding and everyday language, finding that words favored by LLMs show increased frequency in both coding sessions and Google Trends, raising concerns about humans adopting LLM writing styles.

Toward LLMs Beyond English-Centric Development

arXiv cs.CL

This paper demonstrates that LLMs are heavily biased toward English, and shows that continual pre-training does not offer cost advantages over training from scratch for adapting models to other languages, especially for cultural understanding.

@rohanpaul_ai: https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2061959891036885027

X AI KOLs Following

A Stanford Law School study found that law professors rated LLM-generated answers higher than peer answers in a blinded evaluation of short-answer tutoring in contracts courses, with LLMs winning 75.33% of comparisons and being flagged as harmful less often.