SkillEvolBench: Benchmarking the Evolution from Episodic Experience to Procedural Skills
Summary
SkillEvolBench is a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating whether large language model agents can distill episodic experience into reusable procedural skills. It includes 180 tasks across six environments and finds that current agents often struggle to form robust reusable skills, with raw trajectory reuse often outperforming distilled skills.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/26/26, 06:42 AM
Paper page - SkillEvolBench: Benchmarking the Evolution from Episodic Experience to Procedural Skills
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.24117 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Current large language model agents struggle to form robust reusable skills from episodic experience, with raw trajectory reuse often outperforming distilled skills due to discarded contextual cues.
Large language model (LLM) agents accumulate richepisodic trajectorieswhile solving real-world tasks, but it remains unclear whether such experience can be distilled into reusableprocedural skills. We introduce SkillEvolBench, adiagnostic benchmarkfor evaluating this step fromexperience reusetoskill formation. It contains 180 tasks across six real-world agent environments, organized intorole-conditioned task familieswith shared latent procedures. Agents learn from acquisition tasks, update an externalskill libraryusing compacted trajectories andverifier feedback, and then face frozen deployment tasks testing context shift, adversarial shortcuts, and composition. By comparing self-generated and curated-start skill evolution against no-skill and raw-trajectory controls, SkillEvolBench separatesprocedural abstractionfrom base capability, curated prior knowledge, and direct reuse of episodic traces. Across ten model configurations and three agent harnesses, we find that current agents often adapt locally but rarely form robust reusable skills.Skill-based conditionscan improve acquisition or replay, and individual models sometimes gain on specific deployment axes, but these gains are unstable under frozen deployment. Raw-trajectory reuse frequently outperforms distilled skills, suggesting that current abstraction procedures discard contextual and procedural cues that remain useful for future tasks. Capacity and cost analyses further show that writing more skills or larger Tier-3 resource libraries is not sufficient: additional updates can improve coverage while introducingepisode-specific driftandprocedural clutter. These findings position SkillEvolBench as a testbed for measuring when one-off experience becomes durable procedural knowledge rather than task-local memory.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605\.24117
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.24117 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.24117 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.24117 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
SkillFlow:Benchmarking Lifelong Skill Discovery and Evolution for Autonomous Agents
SkillFlow introduces a benchmark of 166 tasks across 20 families for evaluating autonomous agents' ability to discover, repair, and maintain skills over time through a lifelong learning protocol. Experiments reveal a substantial capability gap among leading models, with Claude Opus 4.6 improving significantly while others show limited or negative gains from skill evolution.
SkillLearnBench: Benchmarking Continual Learning Methods for Agent Skill Generation on Real-World Tasks
SkillLearnBench introduces the first benchmark for evaluating continual skill learning in LLM agents across 20 real-world tasks, revealing that no method dominates and scaling LLMs does not guarantee better skills.
EvoClawBench: Can Agents Learn Reusable Skills from Their Own Runs?
This paper introduces EvoClawBench, a benchmark designed to test whether AI agents can learn reusable skills from their own execution runs. Experiments with multiple agent runtimes show that skill learning is selective and cost-sensitive, not an automatic benefit.
Agent Skill Evaluation and Evolution: Frameworks and Benchmarks
This survey systematically examines skill evolution and evaluation for agentic systems, categorizing evolution into four paradigms and analyzing six skill-centric benchmark categories to identify structural gaps and open directions.
SkillTV-Bench: Benchmarking How Well Judges Perform on Skill-Augmented Agentic Execution
Introduces SkillTV-Bench, a 681-case benchmark for evaluating skill-aware trajectory verification in LLM agents, along with SkillTV-Evolve, a method that externalizes verification knowledge as a reusable JudgeSkill, improving judge accuracy by 14.8 percentage points.