Modular Pretraining Enables Access Control

# Modular Pretraining Enables Access Control
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08077](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08077)
Authors:[Ethan Roland](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Roland,+E),[Murat Cubuktepe](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Cubuktepe,+M),[Erick Martinez](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Martinez,+E),[Stijn Servaes](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Servaes,+S),[Keenan Pepper](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Pepper,+K),[Mike Vaiana](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Vaiana,+M),[Diogo Schwerz de Lucena](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=de+Lucena,+D+S),[Judd Rosenblatt](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Rosenblatt,+J),[Addie Foote](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Foote,+A),[Cem Anil](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Anil,+C),[Alex Cloud](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Cloud,+A)

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.08077)

> Abstract:AI developers face a dual\-use dilemma\. An AI capability that helps one user cure a disease can help another synthesize one\. This dilemma could be resolved with access control, limiting dual\-use AI capabilities to trusted deployments with a legitimate need\. A gold standard for access control would be to serve separate models with different capabilities to different users\. However, training and deploying multiple models is prohibitively expensive\. To address this challenge, we propose gradient\-routed auxiliary modules \(GRAM\), a pre\-training method that adds modules to a neural network and selectively updates them to induce specialization\. Ablating a module at inference time removes its capability from the network, approximating a model trained on filtered data\. We evaluate GRAM on synthetic stories and realistic dual\-use data spanning virology, cybersecurity, nuclear physics, and specialized code\. These experiments show that GRAM disables targeted capabilities while preserving the rest, and resists their recovery under finetuning better than post\-hoc unlearning\. Most importantly, a Chinchilla\-optimal scaling analysis from 50M to 5B parameters shows that the gap between data\-filtered and full\-data models widens with scale on removed capabilities but stays small on retained ones, and that GRAM closely tracks data filtering\. GRAM's training cost is independent of the number of supported capability profiles, yielding a 5x reduction over data filtering in our 5\-profile setting\.

## Submission history

From: Alex Cloud \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/80ce6cc9/2607.08077)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 9 Jul 2026 03:12:44 UTC \(675 KB\)