@MaximeRivest: If you pay for an LLM to do inference (which you pretty much always do), you should save any successful run; it is, by …
Summary
Maxime Rivest argues that any successful paid LLM inference run should be saved, since it constitutes a valuable example dataset, a view echoed by Gal Elmalah who frames data as a future asset.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/20/26, 07:36 AM
If you pay for an LLM to do inference (which you pretty much always do), you should save any successful run; it is, by definition, a valuable example dataset for you.
Gal Elmalah (@GalElmalah): This is pretty cool! Need to start thinking about my data as future asset
Similar Articles
@h100envy: Ex-vLLM core contributor explained how to make LLM inference 10x cheaper in 34 minutes - better than $3000 inference op…
An ex-vLLM core contributor explains how to reduce LLM inference cost by 10x using LMCache with KV cache offloading to CPU/SSD/remote storage, a technique used by production stacks like Bloomberg.
Your LLM inference benchmark is lying to you
The article explains why synthetic benchmarks for LLM inference can be misleading, as production traffic is bursty and variable, and recommends testing with real workloads to choose the right inference framework.
@smolix: Here's part 1 (of 5) of my short course on efficient LLM inference that I taught at Columbia University. Slides are hea…
Part 1 of a 5-part short course on efficient LLM inference taught at Columbia University. Covers hardware bottlenecks, GPU memory bandwidth limits, and techniques like model compression and KV cache optimization to reduce inference cost.
@divaagurlxw: I spent last few months Learning LLM Inference. Here are the best resources I have come across. 1. 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧…
A tweet thread shares a curated list of resources for learning LLM inference, covering tokenization, GPU hardware, optimization techniques like quantization and speculative decoding, and inference engines such as vLLM and SGLang, followed by an Nvidia architect's talk summary.
@neural_avb: If you think about it, LLM training in 2026 is really a 3-step loop : - train it on some data - dogfood it/run categori…
The tweet outlines a 3-step loop for LLM training in 2026: train on data, run evals, and add synthetic data for underperforming tasks. It emphasizes the accessibility of legal distillation via open source models and cheap APIs, noting that training on reasoning traces alone can achieve high scores.