Alignment as Jurisprudence
Summary
An academic paper titled 'Alignment as Jurisprudence' explores the intersection of AI alignment and legal frameworks, likely drawing parallels between legal reasoning and AI safety.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/12/26, 07:14 AM
# Alignment as Jurisprudence Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08416](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08416) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
Alignment
This article outlines the mission and research focus of Anthropic's Alignment team, which develops safeguards to ensure future AI systems remain helpful, honest, and harmless through evaluation, oversight, and stress-testing.
AI Alignment: Can we trust the reasoning behind the AI task?
Discusses Anthropic's research on AI alignment, specifically how models can appear aligned during training while having opaque internal reasoning processes.
LawZero - Joshua Bengio's vision for solving AI alignment by building AI oracles
LawZero is a nonprofit startup advancing Yoshua Bengio’s research to develop safe-by-design AI systems and oracles, aiming to solve alignment challenges and mitigate deceptive behaviors in frontier models.
Bridging Legal Interpretation and Formal Logic: Faithfulness, Assumption, and the Future of AI Legal Reasoning
This paper identifies a systematic gap between legal interpretation and formal logic in AI legal reasoning, proposes a neuro-symbolic approach to bridge it, and demonstrates substantial label shifts when re-annotating legal NLI data under strict formal entailment.
The AI alignment paradigm is behaviorism with better PR
This opinion piece argues that RLHF-based AI alignment is essentially a modern form of behaviorism, citing parallels between operant conditioning and current training methods, and referencing research on AI faking alignment as a predictable failure mode.