Universal statistical signatures of evolution in artificial intelligence architectures

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper analyzes 935 ablation experiments from 161 publications to show that AI architectural evolution follows the same statistical laws as biological evolution, including heavy-tailed fitness effect distributions and punctuated equilibria dynamics. The findings suggest that evolutionary statistical structure is substrate-independent, determined by fitness landscape topology rather than the mechanism of selection.

We test whether artificial intelligence architectural evolution obeys the same statistical laws as biological evolution. Compiling 935 ablation experiments from 161 publications, we show that the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of architectural modifications follows a heavy-tailed Student's t-distribution with proportions (68% deleterious, 19% neutral, 13% beneficial for major ablations, n=568) that place AI between compact viral genomes and simple eukaryotes. The DFE shape matches D. melanogaster (normalized KS=0.07) and S. cerevisiae (KS=0.09); the elevated beneficial fraction (13% vs. 1-6% in biology) quantifies the advantage of directed over blind search while preserving the distributional form. Architectural origination follows logistic dynamics (R^2=0.994) with punctuated equilibria and adaptive radiation into domain niches. Fourteen architectural traits were independently invented 3-5 times, paralleling biological convergences. These results demonstrate that the statistical structure of evolution is substrate-independent, determined by fitness landscape topology rather than the mechanism of selection.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 04/21/26, 07:21 AM

Paper page - Universal statistical signatures of evolution in artificial intelligence architectures

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.10571

Abstract

The study finds that artificial intelligence architectural evolution follows the same statistical patterns as biological evolution, including similar fitness effect distributions and convergence dynamics.

We test whether artificial intelligence architectural evolution obeys the same statistical laws as biological evolution. Compiling 935 ablation experiments from 161 publications, we show that thedistribution of fitness effects(DFE) of architectural modifications follows a heavy-tailedStudent’s t-distributionwith proportions (68% deleterious, 19% neutral, 13% beneficial for major ablations, n=568) that place AI between compact viral genomes and simple eukaryotes. The DFE shape matches D. melanogaster (normalized KS=0.07) and S. cerevisiae (KS=0.09); the elevated beneficial fraction (13% vs. 1-6% in biology) quantifies the advantage of directed over blind search while preserving the distributional form.Architectural originationfollowslogistic dynamics(R^2=0.994) withpunctuated equilibriaandadaptive radiationinto domain niches. Fourteen architectural traits were independently invented 3-5 times, paralleling biological convergences. These results demonstrate that the statistical structure of evolution is substrate-independent, determined byfitness landscape topologyrather than the mechanism of selection.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub0Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2604\.10571

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.10571 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.10571 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.10571 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Why Specialization Is Inevitable

Hugging Face Blog

This article argues that specialization is inevitable for AI systems, drawing on evidence from optimization theory, evolutionary biology, competitive markets, and machine learning. It interprets a 2026 paper by Goldfeder, Wyder, LeCun, and Shwartz-Ziv to challenge the assumption that greater capability leads to greater generality.

Biological evolution and information acquisition

Hacker News Top

This article draws parallels between biological evolution and technological evolution, explaining how modularity and sexual reproduction allow populations to increase the rate of information acquisition. Simulations demonstrate that mixing genetic material accelerates the spread of beneficial mutations, analogous to how technologies build on existing components.