EMNLP workshop any good? Or any other NLP venue good for VLM eval work? [D]
Summary
A PhD student asks whether submitting vision-language model evaluation work to an EMNLP workshop is worthwhile after rejection from a top imaging venue.
Similar Articles
@DanKornas: LLM eval is where most AI demos start becoming real systems. LLM-Evaluation is a public GitHub resource with workshop s…
A tweet announces LLM-Evaluation, a public GitHub repository containing workshop slides, sample notebooks, prompts, and reference links for evaluating LLMs, generative AI, and RAG systems, aiming to provide a practical map of evaluation workflows.
@maximelabonne: Neat app to understand and explore VLM evals
A shared app for exploring and understanding vision language model evaluations, referencing a thread analyzing popular vision benchmarks.
EMNLP Industry 2026 Paper Reviews [D]
Paper reviews for the EMNLP Industry 2026 track have been released, prompting discussion.
When Seeing Is Not Enough: Benchmarking Interactive Visual Grounding in LVLMs
This paper introduces a controlled evaluation framework for interactive visual grounding in large vision-language models (LVLMs), showing that current LVLMs perform below human baselines and struggle with proactive question-driven grounding.
Where to submit stat/prob ML [D]
A researcher in statistical and probabilistic ML discusses the overwhelming presence of LLM-based works in top conferences like ICLR and NeurIPS, and explores alternative venues such as AISTATS and UAI for publishing such research.