How would you separate model improvements from agent infrastructure in an evaluation?

Reddit r/artificial News

Summary

The post discusses the October 12 Cheeky Pint episode featuring Zuckerberg and Wang, posing methodological questions about how to isolate model improvements from agent infrastructure in AI agent evaluations. It suggests controlled comparisons with fixed tool setups and each model's preferred setup, with task completion, permission violations, and recovery failures reported separately.

In the October 12 Cheeky Pint episode, Zuckerberg and Wang describe agent behaviour as something shaped through model training, while also discussing the surrounding privacy and security infrastructure. How would you test which layer is responsible for better results? Holding the tools and task set fixed while swapping models seems useful, but models may have been trained around different tool interfaces. Would a comparison need both a shared setup and each model’s preferred setup, with task completion, permission violations and recovery from failed actions reported separately? Source: https://cheekypint.transistor.fm/35/transcript
Original Article

Similar Articles

How do you compare local and hosted models inside the same agent workflow?

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The article discusses the challenges of comparing local and hosted AI models within agent workflows, highlighted by Raycast v2.2's update to route workflows through various providers. It seeks advice on building provider-neutral evaluations and identifies variables like tool support and latency as hardest to keep constant.