Wasserstein-Barycentric Interaction Fields for Spatial Factor Models: Evidence from Language-Model Representations

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper introduces a method using Wasserstein barycenters to reconstruct language model embedding fields for predicting peer-misalignment penalties in spatial factor models, outperforming conventional weighting schemes.

Spatial return models take the interaction matrix as given and leave feedback uninterpreted. We construct a bandwidth-free field from firms' language-model article embedding distributions using target-anchored Wasserstein barycentric reconstruction. A quadratic exposure-adjustment problem maps feedback into a peer-misalignment penalty ratio. For 52 firms, the field, frozen from 2018-2022 news, yields a 2023-2026 penalty ratio of 3.46 (95% interval [2.89, 4.17]) and higher conditional quasi-likelihood than equal-weighted peer support or RBF weighting of the same distances. Joint penalty ratios for the barycentric and news co-mention fields are 2.33 and 0.86 with boundary calibrated tests which reject both exclusions.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/03/26, 11:51 AM

Paper page - Wasserstein-Barycentric Interaction Fields for Spatial Factor Models: Evidence from Language-Model Representations

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.29669

Abstract

A language-model embedding field reconstructed via Wasserstein barycenters predicts peer-misalignment penalties more accurately than conventional weighting schemes.

Spatial return models take the interaction matrix as given and leave feedback uninterpreted. We construct a bandwidth-free field from firms’ language-model article embedding distributions using target-anchoredWasserstein barycentric reconstruction. Aquadratic exposure-adjustmentproblem maps feedback into a peer-misalignment penalty ratio. For 52 firms, the field, frozen from 2018-2022 news, yields a 2023-2026 penalty ratio of 3.46 (95% interval [2.89, 4.17]) and higher conditional quasi-likelihood than equal-weighted peer support or RBF weighting of the same distances. Joint penalty ratios for the barycentric and news co-mention fields are 2.33 and 0.86 with boundary calibrated tests which reject both exclusions.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608\.29669

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.29669 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.29669 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.29669 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Location-Aware Language Models via Secondary Embeddings

arXiv cs.CL

The paper proposes a lightweight, model-agnostic method to enhance language models with geo-spatial awareness by augmenting embeddings with location data, improving spatial alignment while maintaining standard NLP performance.

Relation Geometry in Semantic Space of Language Models

arXiv cs.CL

This paper explores how semantic relations are encoded in the geometry of language model semantic spaces, finding that asymmetric relations occupy distinct regions and that lexical information matters more for causal models while contextual information matters more for masked and diffusion models.

Why Far Looks Up: Probing Spatial Representation in Vision-Language Models

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Investigates spatial representation in vision-language models, revealing a consistent bias where models conflate vertical image position with distance, and introduces SpatialTunnel synthetic benchmark to expose this shortcut; finds that better disentangled spatial representations improve robustness.