Entity-Aware Evaluation of OCR Systems for Historical Document Transcription
Summary
该论文提出实体级分析作为补充视角来评估历史文档OCR质量,使用Berrutti档案馆175份文档及5,209条人工标注实体,比较了序列识别OCR系统、OCR专用视觉-语言模型和通用视觉-语言模型,发现不同评价标准下OCR排名会变化。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/28/26, 01:57 AM
# Entity-Aware Evaluation of OCR Systems for Historical Document Transcription Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33004](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33004) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.33004) > Abstract:Optical Character Recognition \(OCR\) is essential for digitizing historical archives, yet standard evaluation metrics such as Character Error Rate \(CER\) do not necessarily reflect whether meaningful information, such as names, dates, and identifiers, is preserved\. In this work, we investigate entitylevel analysis of OCR errors as a complementary perspective for evaluating OCR quality in historical documents\. Using a publicly available benchmark of 175 documents from the Berrutti Archive, augmented with 5,209 manually annotated entity mentions that will be released upon acceptance, we compare sequence\-recognition OCR systems, OCR\-specialized vision\-language models, and general\-purpose vision\-language models\. Beyond global transcription accuracy, we analyze entity preservation and recoverability under varying character\-level edit tolerances\. Our experiments show that OCR rankings depend on the evaluation criterion: while Qwen 3\.6 achieves the highest entity coverage across all tested tolerances, several systems with lower exact\-match coverage recover substantially when small errors are tolerated, suggesting that many of their errors correspond to localized character\-level deviations rather than fundamentally incorrect entity transcriptions\. Conversely, some systems remain unable to recover many entities even under relaxed matching\. These findings show that OCR quality cannot be fully characterized by aggregate transcription metrics alone and highlight the importance of evaluating how OCR errors affect the preservation and recoverability of meaningful information\. ## Submission history From: Diego Belzarena \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/cb1e81cb/2610.33004)\] \[via CCSD proxy\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 7 Oct 2026 12:12:01 UTC \(469 KB\)
Similar Articles
DocOCR-Eval: A Correction-Based Framework for OCR Tool Selection Without Ground Truth
DocOCR-Eval proposes an annotation-free framework that uses a correction and ranking strategy to evaluate and select OCR tools without ground truth labels, showing that aggregating multiple multimodal large language models improves alignment with human rankings.
A 1.3B OCR model just hit 93.68 on real-world document parsing and there's now an AI judge for OCR errors
OpenBMB 发布 MiniCPM-OCR Jev(2B 参数),一款 OCR 质量评估模型,可对文本、公式和表格区域的识别结果打 0-1 分,在 JevOCRBench 上决策 AUROC 达 93.6,超过多个更大的模型,并在多种 OCR 模型输出上保持稳定泛化。
Looking for advice on OCR model selection for a multi-document ERP system
The author seeks advice on choosing OCR models for a multi-document ERP system that handles mixed languages, handwritten text, and complex scan formats.
PolyOCR-Venus: Unified OCR Foundation Models for Text-Centric Visual Intelligence
PolyOCR-Venus 提出了一系列统一的 OCR 基础模型,结合共享指令框架、大规模数据引擎与Competence-Guided Policy Optimization,并发布修订版 OCRBench v2.1 基准,在多个文档理解基准上达到最先进的性能。
Equal CER, Unequal Damage: Severity-Weighted Character Error Rate for OCR
论文提出 semCER,一种利用 LLM 评审按严重程度对字符编辑加权的 OCR 评估指标,相比标准 CER 更能贴合人类评分,并在英、越、中等 16 种语言上验证有效,同时发布了 6100 万条已评分编辑数据集与蒸馏打分模型。