README, not
Summary
A blog post proposes adding a READMENOT file to projects to clearly indicate that the code is AI-generated slop not intended for direct human reading, helping users avoid wasting attention on machine outputs.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/16/26, 01:56 PM
Similar Articles
@rauchg: Reject non-understanding. Slop grenades are not just code and PRs. We run a real risk that *reading* gets entirely disc…
The tweet warns against the dangers of AI-generated low-quality content, citing an example where a PR description inaccurately attributed a performance improvement to a compiler change when it was actually due to algorithmic changes. It advocates for AI to enhance understanding and human cognition.
Reviewing code requires reading
A developer blog post argues against the idea of shipping AI-generated code to production without reading it, emphasizing that code review serves critical purposes: diffusing responsibility, reducing bus factor, and maintaining team knowledge of the codebase.
@DanKornas: A useful README shouldn’t take longer to write than the project itself. ReadmeAI is a Python CLI for developers who wan…
ReadmeAI is a Python CLI tool that automatically generates structured README files from local or remote repositories using AI models or offline mode, supporting multiple providers and customization.
@rauchg: Working on a new little project. The 𝚁𝙴𝙰𝙳𝙼𝙴 is fully written by hand, because it's for human consumption. The doc…
Guillermo Rauch (rauchg) teases a new small project, arguing that READMEs and blogs should be written by humans for human storytelling, while internal documentation can be written in "AI English" for agents to consume.
@dzhng: https://x.com/dzhng/status/2090252351533973768
The article discusses the challenge of AI-generated code 'slop' due to human review bottlenecks and argues that software engineering must evolve to focus on system design rather than code readability.