@eastweb3eth: The famous [游资Skills] joins Serenity and other judges. 游资Skills is well-known to everyone. As the most popular skill in stock analysis, it just updated on June 8th, with the number of judges reaching 65. This time, @aleabitoreddit and other judges have joined. This ...
Summary
游资Skills is an open-source deep analysis engine for individual stocks, integrating a panel of 65 investment experts. It supports multiple AI agents and aims to provide comprehensive stock analysis capabilities.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/10/26, 07:48 AM
The Renowned [Youzi Skills] Has Joined Serenity and Other Judges
You all are very familiar with Youzi Skills – the most popular Skill in the stock analysis field. It has just been updated on June 8, with the number of judges reaching 65. This time, @aleabitoreddit and others have joined the panel.
This Skill is a deep individual stock analysis engine that lets 65 investment experts help you analyze the market. Currently, the 65-member panel across 9 domains is as follows:
- AI Bottleneck/Chokepoint Hunter: Serenity (@aleabitoreddit)
- Tech Leaders Faction: Jensen Huang (NVIDIA) · Elon Musk (Tesla) · Sam Altman (OpenAI) · Saylor (MSTR)
- Quantitative Systems: Simons · Thorp · David Shaw · Asness (AQR)
- A-Share Hot Money: Zhang Mengzhu · Zhao Laoge · Chaogu Yangjia · Foshan Wuyingjiao · Beijing Chaojia · Xin Duoduo, etc.
- Chinese Value Investors: Duan Yongping · Zhang Kun · Zhu Shaoxing · Xie Zhiyu · Feng Liu · Deng Xiaofeng · Zhang Lei (Hillhouse)
- Technical Trends: Livermore · Minervini · Darvas · Gann
- Macro Hedging: Soros · Dalio · Howard Marks · Druckenmiller · Robertson · Burry (The Big Short) · Chanos (Short Hunter)
- Growth Investing: Lynch · Cathie Wood · Thiel · Andreessen (a16z) · Gurley (Benchmark) · Naval · Gerstner (Altimeter) · Chamath
- Classic Value: Buffett · Graham · Munger · Fisher · Templeton · Klarman
Repository: https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill
I’m Nika, and I regularly share useful and interesting tools and projects in AI, US stocks, and Web3. If interested, feel free to follow. See you next time~
wbh604/UZI-Skill
Source: https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill
UZI Skill
“51 investment experts help you analyze stocks – Buffett and Zhao Laoge finally sit at the same table.”
License: MIT
Python 3.9+ (https://python.org)
Claude Code (https://claude.com/product/claude-code)
Dimensions
Investors
Methods
Self-Review
A-Share / HK / US Stocks · Deep Individual Stock Analysis Engine · v3.8.0 Tier-1: Five Methods + Serenity Rigor (8 Penalties + Evidence Ladder + Supply Chain Layering) + DuPont/KDJ/OBV/Williams · v3.7.1 Added Serenity intro on homepage + --school H/I · v3.7.0 13 newly joined tech giants (52→65 judges)
Installation · Usage · Three Depth Levels · Hermes 🆕 · Panel · Serenity 🆕 · Institutional Methods · Self-Check Gate · Report Screenshots · FAQ · Group Communication · Contributors
中文 | English
🚀 Get Started in 30 Seconds
Just throw one sentence into any agent – it works after installation. Detailed installation steps are in Installation.
| Your Agent | This Sentence |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | /plugin marketplace add wbh604/UZI-Skill then /plugin install stock-deep-analyzer@uzi-skill |
| Codex / OpenAI CLI | “Follow https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill/main/.codex/INSTALL.md to install UZI-Skill, then analyze 600519” |
| Cursor | /add-plugin stock-deep-analyzer |
| Gemini CLI | gemini extensions install https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill |
| Hermes | ⚠️ hermes skills install is currently flagged by Skills Guard (https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/1006) · Bypass with one-click script: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill/main/install-hermes.sh | bash · See INSTALL-HERMES.md |
| OpenClaw / Lobster | “Install the stock analysis skill from https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill” |
| CLI Direct | git clone https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill.git && cd UZI-Skill && pip install -r requirements.txt && python run.py 贵州茅台 |
After installation, the four most common commands (say directly in any agent):
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock 贵州茅台← Full 22-dimension × 65-judge analysis (5–8 min)/stock-deep-analyzer:quick-scan 002217← 30-second quick judgment/stock-deep-analyzer:scan-trap 002217← Scam stock screening/stock-deep-analyzer:dcf 600519← DCF valuation special
💡 Current latest stable version v3.3.2:
- v3.3.2 · 🆕 GitHub issues #50 + #51 hotfix (community-driven) · #50 institutional missing import svg_sparkline causing Stage 2 NameError · #51 XueQiu cubes_search.json endpoint offline → changed to query/v1/search/cube/stock.json (thanks @chenxiang-bj / @bilieebiliee1-design / @Kylin824)
- v3.3.1 · Hermes compatibility regression fix (v3.x refactoring period main branch missing Hermes adaptation; root cause of user errors) · main branch now directly supports
hermes skills install- v3.3.0 · Branch integration: cherry-picked segmental rendering layer into v3.2 architecture · Cleaned up 22 stale branches (retained only main + hermes-compat)
- v3.2.0 ·
assemble_report.pyreduced from 2964 to 587 lines (-80%) · Split into 5lib/report/*.pysubmodules- v3.1.0 ·
run_real_test.pyreduced from 2105 to 735 lines (-65%) · 1228 lines of pure functions moved tolib/pipeline/score_fns.py- v3.0.0 · Pipeline architecture enabled by default (
python run.pyuses new path by default;UZI_LEGACY=1for old path)Two large files combined: 5069 → 1322 lines (-74%) · 332 tests all pass · End-to-end test 002217 resume generates report in 10s · All v2.x APIs 100% backward-compatible.
v2.15 series still retained: capital_flow universe cache (100x speedup) · school_scores grouped by school · Hybrid formula + polarization stretch.
Hermes users with old remnants may see errors · Reinstall once to fix (
hermes skills uninstallthen install 4 skills) · See INSTALL-HERMES.md.
💬 No Group!
I don’t know why the communication group got banned either… If I create a group, it gets banned. If you have ideas, add me directly. Only for the plugin itself or other interesting projects and quant topics, not individual stocks.
Too many people adding me; please include a note so I know what’s going on…
Acknowledgments
Learn AI at L Station! Thanks to Linux.do (https://linux.do/) community support.
What Is This?
In one sentence: input a stock, Claude becomes your personal analyst – runs data across 22 dimensions, calls 17 Wall Street analysis models, lets 51 investment experts with completely different styles each give a score, and finally produces a 600KB Bloomberg-style report.
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock 国盾量子
After 5–8 minutes, you’ll get:
- An HTML report – can be opened directly in a browser, self-contained, works offline
- A WeChat Moments vertical image – 1080×1920, ready to share
- A WeChat group battle card – 1920×1080
- A one-paragraph summary – copy and paste into the group
Why This Was Made
Previously, analyzing a stock required: East Money for fundamentals → Tonghuashun for K-line → Xueqiu for expert opinions → research reports for sell-side views → Excel for DCF → and still lose money after buying.
All these steps are essentially “collect information → analyze from multiple angles → draw a conclusion.” Why not have AI do it all?
Looking around, options were either GPT wrappers outputting three paragraphs of nonsense, or institutional terminals that are unaffordable. Anthropic released financial-services-plugins (https://github.com/anthropics/financial-services-plugins) with good methodology (DCF / Comps / LBO), but it’s purely US-stock focused and requires paid data sources.
So I built my own. Completely free data sources, zero API key, works directly for A-shares.
Installation
Regardless of which agent you use, just throw one sentence at it:
Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add wbh604/UZI-Skill
/plugin install stock-deep-analyzer@uzi-skill
After installation, say /stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock 贵州茅台.
⚠️ Must include
stock-deep-analyzer:namespace prefix
After installing the plugin in Claude Code, all skills/commands start withstock-deep-analyzer:.
In some environments, short names (/analyze-stock) may not be automatically resolved – for safety, always use the full name:
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock <symbol>/stock-deep-analyzer:quick-scan <symbol>/stock-deep-analyzer:scan-trap <symbol>/stock-deep-analyzer:dcf <symbol>/stock-deep-analyzer:ic-memo <symbol>/stock-deep-analyzer:investor-panel <symbol>/stock-deep-analyzer:trap-detector <symbol>/stock-deep-analyzer:deep-analysis <symbol>- and all other 14 commands
Same for Cursor / Gemini CLI / Codex: always use full names with
/stock-deep-analyzer:to avoid parsing failures.
Codex
Simply tell Codex:
Please follow the instructions at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill/main/.codex/INSTALL.md to install UZI-Skill, then help me do a deep analysis of 贵州茅台.
OpenClaw / Lobster
Tell Lobster:
Help me install the stock analysis skill from https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill, then analyze 贵州茅台.
Cursor
/add-plugin stock-deep-analyzer
Then say “analyze 贵州茅台”.
Gemini CLI
bash gemini extensions install https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill
OpenCode
Tell OpenCode:
Please follow https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill/main/.opencode/INSTALL.md to install and analyze 贵州茅台.
Windsurf / Devin / Other Agents
Drop this sentence:
Clone https://github.com/wbh604/UZI-Skill, read AGENTS.md to learn how to use it, and help me do a deep analysis of 贵州茅台.
📱 Not at Your Computer?
Tell any agent:
Analyze 贵州茅台 using remote mode; generate a public link so I can view it on my phone.
The agent will automatically start with --remote using Cloudflare Tunnel and give you a https://xxx.trycloudflare.com link.
Usage
Full Deep Analysis (5–8 minutes)
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock 水晶光电
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock 002273
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock 00700.HK
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock AAPL
Specialized Commands
All require the
/stock-deep-analyzer:prefix to guarantee execution.
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
/stock-deep-analyzer:dcf 600519 | DCF valuation · WACC + 5×5 sensitivity table |
/stock-deep-analyzer:comps 002273 | Peer comparison · PE/PB percentile analysis |
/stock-deep-analyzer:lbo 600519 | LBO test · PE buyer IRR |
/stock-deep-analyzer:initiate 002273 | Institutional initiation report · JPM/GS format |
/stock-deep-analyzer:ic-memo 002273 | Investment committee memo · three-scenario returns |
/stock-deep-analyzer:earnings 002273 | Earnings interpretation · beat/miss detection |
/stock-deep-analyzer:catalysts 002273 | Catalyst calendar · next 60 days |
/stock-deep-analyzer:thesis 002273 | Investment logic tracking · 5-pillar monitoring |
/stock-deep-analyzer:screen 002273 | 5 quantitative screens · value/growth/quality |
/stock-deep-analyzer:dd 002273 | Due diligence checklist · 5 workflows, 21 items |
/stock-deep-analyzer:quick-scan 002273 | 30-second quick judgment |
/stock-deep-analyzer:panel-only 600519 | View only 65-judge voting |
/stock-deep-analyzer:scan-trap 002273 | Scam stock screening |
/stock-deep-analyzer:segmental-model 300308 | 🆕 Bottom-up revenue by segment modeling · 3 scenarios × 3-year projection · Cross-validation with DCF |
🎯 Scoring Calibration (v2.11)
Users reported “Moutai scored 47” or “never above 65” – diagnosis found two overly strict formulas. v2.11 calibration:
| Change | Old (v2.9.1) | New (v2.11) | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| verdict threshold | 85/70/55/40 | 80/65/50/35 | No stock ever ≥85 (“worthy of heavy position” slot empty); lowered by 5 so quality/strong stocks can enter “worth watching” tier |
| consensus neutral weight | 0.5 (half weight) | 0.6 | Among 51 judges, value + hot money 35 people are conservative; neutral weight 0.5 gave quality stocks consensus only 37; 0.6 is closer to “not bad but not favorite” semantics |
Formula (unchanged): overall = fund_score × 0.6 + consensus × 0.4
Typical quality stock (e.g., Moutai) expectation:
- v2.9.1:
fund=62 consensus=45 → overall 55 → watch priority - v2.11:
fund=62 consensus=50 → overall 57 → watch priority(but closer to “worth watching” boundary; when quality stock rally starts, easier to reach 65)
Combined effect of both tiers ~5–8 points. Real traps still < 35 → avoid, score discrimination actually improves.
Diagnostic field panel.json::consensus_formula.version = "v2.11 · (bullish + 0.6*neutral) / active" can be audited.
Regression test: tests/test_v2_11_scoring_calibration.py – 8 test cases.
Full calibration record in BUGS-LOG.md v2.11.0 section.
🎚️ Three Depth Levels (v2.10.3 New)
Give users the choice of analysis intensity – quick / normal / deep:
python run.py 600519 --depth lite # ⚡ Quick mode (1–2 min)
python run.py 600519 # 📊 Standard analysis (5–8 min) · default
python run.py 600519 --depth deep # 🔬 Deep research (15–20 min)
Or via environment variable:
export UZI_DEPTH=lite # or medium / deep
python run.py 600519
Summary of Level Differences
| Dimension | ⚡ lite Quick | 📊 medium Standard | 🔬 deep Institutional |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated time | 1–2 min | 5–8 min | 15–20 min |
| Fetcher dimensions | Core 7 | Full 22 | Full 22 + enhanced fallback |
| Number of judges | 10 representatives | 65 full | 65 full + Bull-Bear structured debate |
| Institutional methods | Only DCF | All 17 | All 17 + Segmental Build-Up |
| Qualitative queries (ddgs) | All skip (token saving) | On demand · budget 30 | Full run · budget 60 |
| Fund holders | Top 5 full performance | Top 20 full + rest list | Top 100 full |
| Self-check gate | Critical block | Critical block · warning can ack | Both levels block |
| Playwright fallback (v2.13.1) | ❌ Completely disabled | opt-in · UZI_PLAYWRIGHT_ENABLE=1 · 6 dimensions (4_peers/8_materials/15_events/17_sentiment/7_industry/14_moat) | ✅ Enabled by default · 10 dimensions (medium 6 + 3_macro/13_policy/18_trap/19_contests) · first-time y/n interactive install Chromium |
| Token consumption (Codex) | Most efficient | Medium | Highest |
| Use case | Quick look / boss asking / ETF component pre-check | Daily deep analysis / research writing | IC memo / pre-position deep dive |
Auto-Downgrade Strategy
- First installation /
.cache/_globalempty → auto switch to lite (save first cold start time) - Network pre-check 3+ domains unavailable → auto switch to lite (avoid freeze)
- Manual
--depthalways overrides auto decision
Practical Choices
| Question | Recommended tier |
|---|---|
| “Can I buy this stock?” | medium (default) |
| “Give me a conclusion in 15 minutes” | lite |
| “Boss needs for IC meeting tomorrow” | deep (includes Bull-Bear debate + bottom-up segmental) |
| “ETF code entered (system prompts for component stocks)” | lite (quick component pre-check) |
| “Codex environment / first install” | Don’t worry, auto lite |
Command Mapping (Implicit Tiers)
| Command | Implicit tier |
|---|---|
/stock-deep-analyzer:quick-scan 600519 | lite |
/stock-deep-analyzer:panel-only 600519 | lite |
/stock-deep-analyzer:analyze-stock 600519 | medium (default) |
/stock-deep-analyzer:ic-memo 600519 | deep |
/stock-deep-analyzer:initiate 600519 | deep |
🎭 65-Member Panel
Not template phrases. Each person has their own quantitative rule set (236 rules total), and their recommendation must cite which specific rules were triggered.
Since v3.7.0, 13 newly added tech giants + an independent Group I Serenity (AI bottleneck/chokepoint hunter) cover 9 major schools:
| Group | Style | Count | Representatives |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Classic Value | 6 | Buffett · Graham · Munger · Fisher · Templeton · Klarman |
| B | Growth Investing | 9 | Lynch · Cathie Wood · Thiel · Andreessen (a16z) · Gurley (Benchmark) · Naval · Gerstner (Altimeter) · Chamath |
| C | Macro Hedging | 7 | Soros · Dalio · Howard Marks · Druckenmiller · Robertson · Burry (The Big Short) · Chanos (Short Hunter) |
| D | Technical Trends | 4 | Livermore · Minervini · Darvas · Gann |
| E | Chinese Value Investors | 7 | Duan Yongping · Zhang Kun · Zhu Shaoxing · Xie Zhiyu · Feng Liu · Deng Xiaofeng · Zhang Lei (Hillhouse) |
| F | A-Share Hot Money | 23 | Zhang Mengzhu · Zhao Laoge · Chaogu Yangjia · Foshan Wuyingjiao · Beijing Chaojia · Xin Duoduo … |
| G | Quantitative Systems | 4 | Simons · Thorp · David Shaw · Asness (AQR) |
| H | Tech Leaders 🆕 | 4 | Jensen Huang (NVIDIA) · Elon Musk (Tesla) · Sam Altman (OpenAI) · Saylor (MSTR) |
| I | AI Bottleneck Hunter 🆕 | 1 | Serenity (@aleabitoreddit) |
v3.7.0 (2026-06) new 13 bold. Group H are tech CEOs with their own supply chain perspective; Group I Serenity is a single special judge (see below).
Example:
Buffett gives 水晶光电 62 points · Neutral
“Watch: moat 27/40 visible; but ROE 5-year low 6.7%, compliance rate only 0/5”
✅ Debt ratio 30% conservative · ❌ ROE 5-year low 6.7%
Jensen Huang gives a certain CPO optical module stock 100 points · Bullish
“In the AI compute chain · directly benefits from data center CapEx · gross margin ≥50% strong pricing power – it’s a beneficiary of Moore’s Law at the speed of light.”
✅ Strong correlation with AI compute demand · ✅ Deep CUDA/ecosystem binding
Klarman gives 水晶光电 0 points · Bearish
“Bearish core: no 30% margin of safety”
🧠 Group I · Serenity · AI Bottleneck/Chokepoint Hunter
Key figure: @aleabitoreddit (https://x.com/aleabitoreddit), a star overseas retail researcher that exploded on X (Twitter) in 2026.
Separated into its own group with its own score – because her style is highly concentrated, highly contrarian, unlike any institutional big name.
Who Is She?
- Self-described background: Former AI research scientist · Nature paper author · Former RISC-V Foundation member · Semiconductor/optical communications engineer
- Uses anime avatar, anonymous, no face reveal, doesn’t sell courses or copy-trade – all research free and public · 300K+ X followers
- Breakout win: Predicted the InP substrate bottleneck stock AXTI (12 → $70+, peak $115–140) about a year in advance. In Q1 2026, IntelliEPI CEO publicly confirmed “InP shortage is the bottleneck of the entire AI infrastructure.”
⚠️ Her identity and returns are self-reported/media-reported, not third-party audited; numbers from different sources contradict. This project only distills her methodology as an analytical perspective, not endorsing her actual track record. See
docs/serenity-research-dossier.md(20+ sources with itemized records).
Her Role in UZI-Skill
Her AI industry chain bottleneck/chokepoint theory is turned into a quantifiable judge –
Don’t buy AI leaders (stocks like NVIDIA already fully priced), but go upstream along the supply chain to find that one “indispensable, most supply-constrained” small-cap gem in the second/third tier, and position before the market prices it in.
Leaders bought up → go upstream along supply chain → find the hardest-to-replace link → find the tightest-supply small cap in that link → position early
Core scoring logic: “position determines stance” – doesn’t look at cheap valuation or fast growth; only one variable: whether this company’s product is choking someone else in the current AI wave.
| Judgment | Stance |
|---|---|
| Choking (irreplaceable + supply bottleneck + not priced in) | 🟢 Bullish / potential heavy position |
| In AI chain but not a strong choke (substitutable / ample capacity) | ⚖️ Neutral · pending verification |
| Not a chokepoint / just concept hype / not in AI chain | 🔴 Skip directly (white liquor, banks with full moat score 0) |
Deciding whether a link is a “chokepoint” looks at three things:
- Hard to replace (how long to switch supplier/material/process – longer is better →
14_moatswitching cost) - Tight supply (whether capacity can keep up with AI demand curve – less is better →
7_industry) - Not priced in (market still views it with old narratives like “cyclical stock / old semiconductor / niche material” →
5_chain+15_events).
How to Run Serenity’s Perspective Alone
python run.py 300394.SZ --school I # Only Serenity's "chokepoint" judgment
python run.py NVDA --school H # Only Group H tech leaders (Jensen Huang/Musk/Altman/Saylor)
Six-step methodology + alpha 5 dimensions: see
skills/deep-analysis/references/fin-methods/serenity-bottleneck.md;
Tone library + scoring rules: seeskills/investor-panel/references/group-i-serenity.md.
📐 17 Institutional-Grade Methods
Porting methodologies from anthropics/financial-services-plugins (https://github.com/anthropics/financial-services-plugins), adapted to A-share parameters (rf=2.5% / ERP=6% / tax rate 25% / terminal growth g=2.5%):
Valuation Modeling
- DCF (WACC breakdown + two-stage FCF + Gordon Growth terminal + 5×5 sensitivity heatmap)
- Comps peer comparison (PE / PB / EV-EBITDA percentile + implied target price)
- Three-statement forecast (5-year IS / BS / CF linked)
- Quick LBO (PE fund perspective IRR cross-validation)
- M&A accretion/dilution model
Research Workflows
- Initiation report (JPM/GS/MS format · rating + target price + thesis + risks)
- Earnings beat/miss interpretation
- Catalyst calendar (real event extraction + future scheduling + impact grading)
- Investment logic tracking (5-pillar health)
- Morning note · quantitative screening · industry summary
Deep Decision-Making
- IC memo (8 chapters · Bull/Base/Bear three scenarios)
- Porter’s Five Forces + BCG matrix
- Due diligence checklist (5 workflows, 21 items · auto completion status)
- Unit economics · value creation plan · portfolio rebalancing
📸 What the Report Looks Like
All screenshots below are from real analysis of 水晶光电 (002273.SZ).
Composite Score + Key Conclusions
Bull-Bear Great Divide
Fisher 100 vs. Klarman 96, three rounds of arguments, each citing specific numbers.
65-Member Panel · Judgment Seats
Each person has a light – green bullish, red bearish, gray neutral.
Chat Room Mode
Judges speak in their own style, citing specific triggered rules.
DCF Valuation · 5×5 Sensitivity Heatmap
WACC 6.96% · Intrinsic Value ¥20.73 · Margin of Safety -28.6%, colors from dark green (undervalued) to dark red (overvalued).
IC Memo · Three-Scenario Returns
Bull ¥26.95 / Base ¥20.73 / Bear ¥14.51, each with probability and assumptions.
22-Dimension Deep Card
Each dimension has its own visualization – K-line candlestick / PE Band / radar chart / supply chain flow / thermometer / donut chart.
WeChat Moments Vertical Image · One-Click Share
🔧 Data Sources
All free, zero API key:
| Data | Primary Source | Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time price / PE / market cap | East Money push2 | Xueqiu → Tencent → Sina → Baidu |
| Earnings history | akshare | Xueqiu f10 |
| K-line / technical indicators | akshare | yfinance |
| Dragon & Tiger list / northbound / margin | akshare | East Money |
| Research reports / announcements | Cninfo + akshare | Tonghuashun |
| HK stocks | akshare hk | yfinance |
| US stocks | yfinance | akshare us |
| Macro / policy / sentiment / scam detection | DuckDuckGo web search | — |
| Social hot trends (v2.12 new) | Weibo / Zhihu / Baidu / Douyin / Toutiao / Bilibili – each platform’s official JSON API | 5-minute file cache · single platform failure doesn’t affect others |
Multi-layer fallback chain – one source fails, automatically switches to next.
📱 6-Platform Social Hot Trends (v2.12 New)
Retail sentiment and scam themes often spread on Douyin/Xiaohongshu/Weibo first, which DuckDuckGo can’t reach. Since v2.12, the 17_sentiment dimension automatically checks:
- Weibo hot search · fetches
weibo.com/ajax/side/hotSearch· 50 real-time trends - Zhihu hot list · fetches
zhihu.com/api/v3/feed/topstory/hot-list-web· 50 items - Baidu hot search · fetches
top.baidu.com/api/board· real-time list - Douyin hot spots · fetches
douyin.com/aweme/v1/web/hot/search/list/· search hotspots - Toutiao hot list · fetches
toutiao.com/hot-event/hot-board/· hot events - Bilibili hot search · fetches
s.search.bilibili.com/main/hotword· site-wide hot words
Stock name (including abbreviations, e.g., “贵州茅台” → “贵州”/“茅台”) if matched in trend titles → added to sentiment heat + record specific entries.
Data structure: synthesis’s 17_sentiment.data.hot_trend_mentions:
{
"stock_name": "贵州茅台",
"platforms_ok": 6,
"total_hits": 3,
"by_platform_count": {"weibo": 2, "zhihu": 1, ...},
"mentions": {
"weibo": [{"rank":3, "title":"茅台 1499 回归", ...}],
...
}
}
Thanks: This module’s design references the
hottrendservice implementation from run-bigpig/jcp (https://github.com/run-bigpig/jcp) (Garlic Plate AI).
🔑 Optional: East Money Miaoxiang Skills API (v2.3 New)
In 2026, push2.eastmoney.com is often blocked by anti-scraping on mainland Chinese networks. If MX_APIKEY is set, UZI-Skill will prioritize the official NLP API:
- Chinese name correction: “北部港湾” → automatically recognized as “北部湾港(000582.SZ)”
- Market snapshot: Bypasses push2 to get latest price/market cap/PE/PB/industry
Configuration:
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env to fill in MX_APIKEY (free to apply at: https://dl.dfcfs.com/m/itc4)
Without key, it falls back to Xueqiu/akshare chain; existing users are unaffected.
🔓 Data Sources Requiring Login (v2.7.1 New)
Some data sources added login authentication in 2026. UZI-Skill does not proactively pop up login windows (remains unattended). Users can enable as needed:
| Data Source | Dimension | Enable Method | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xueqiu cubes_search.json | 19_contests real contest positions | export UZI_XQ_LOGIN=1 then python -m lib.xueqiu_browser login (one-time browser login) | If not enabled: report shows “⚠️ Xueqiu requires login, 0 |
Similar Articles
@eastweb3eth: Serenity: The White-Haired Stock Goddess Skill. Recently, Serenity is definitely the hottest figure in the US stock market track. The reason is their extremely strong ability. This library distills all tweet opinions from @aleabitoreddit into a skill. After installation, you can chat with it. It can...
Serenity.skill is an open-source AI tool that converts Twitter user Serenity's investment research methodology into an Agent Skill, helping users perform industry chain analysis and stock screening through AI.
@369Serena: After Serenity gained popularity, many people's first instinct was to copy the setup. But in reality, we can equip Codex with these investment Skills and AI research frameworks, turning it into a stock research assistant: helping you break down industry chains, read financial reports, gauge sentiment, check risks, perform valuations, write counter-arguments, and even backtest strategies...
This post introduces how to install investment Skills and AI research frameworks into Codex, making it a stock research assistant, and recommends 5 GitHub projects: UZI-Skill, TradingAgents, Serenity Skill, Buffett Skills, QuantDinger, for tasks like industry chain analysis, financial report analysis, risk inspection, etc.
@Ryrenz: Folks, you no longer have to fumble around blindly when evaluating AI apps. evals-skills lets a coding agent guide you through building an evaluation suite tailored to your product. evals-skills has 1,500+ stars on GitHub, and the project says this approach comes from helping over 50 companies with evaluations, …
evals-skills enables coding agents to help developers build AI application evaluation workflows tailored to their products, identifying failure modes before designing scoring criteria. It has earned 1,500+ stars on GitHub. The approach draws on experience conducting evaluations for more than 50 companies and training thousands of learners, and includes skill modules such as error-discovery and validate-evaluator.
@vintcessun: Combine 10 Reddit guru Serenity's supply chain bottleneck analysis repos into one Skill, installable into Codex, Claude, Cursor with a single command. Problem: this Skill is purely third-party distillation, the original author's track record is unaudited – don't treat it as real investment advice. Core mechanism is to modularize the 10 repos' frameworks, knowledge bases, and templates, but the strategy relies on public info and cannot predict black swans. Suitable for learning analytical thinking, not for expecting big wins.
This project integrates 10 repositories based on Reddit user Serenity's investment methodology into a unified Skill that can be installed into AI tools like Codex, Claude, and Cursor with a single command for supply chain bottleneck analysis. Good for learning analytical approaches, but does not constitute investment advice.
@iamai_omni: New buy-side research skill added — pulls original files directly from the SEC for analysis. It's really well-written. Now I always run position changes through the skill first to feel confident. The buy-side research skill is open-sourced. Address: https://github.com/haskaomni/sere…
Open-sourced a set of buy-side research skills for the Codex platform, capable of pulling original files from the SEC for analysis, supporting multiple investment research frameworks.