Toward Responsible and Epistemically Grounded Multilingual LLMs for Computational Social Science and Humanities

arXiv cs.CL Papers

Summary

This paper discusses the need for multilingual LLMs that are epistemically grounded and responsible for applications in computational social science and humanities.

arXiv:2606.00596v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models have rapidly evolved in multilingual competence and reasoning capacity, enabling their integration into Social Sciences and Humanities research workflows. Yet existing evaluation paradigms remain anchored in task-based NLP benchmarks and fail to address interpretive validity, cultural situatedness, and epistemic mediation. This paper reconceptualizes multilingual reasoning LLMs as hermeneutic instruments that actively structure meaning production across linguistic and cultural contexts. Drawing on hermeneutics, philosophy of technology, science and technology studies, multilingual NLP research, and computational social science methodology, we develop a theoretically grounded framework for evaluating multilingual reasoning in Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) research. We articulate a rigorous experimental protocol with operationalized metrics for cultural alignment, cross-lingual stability, and reasoning faithfulness, along with transparency requirements tailored to interpretive research tasks. We illustrate the framework through a concrete application scenario involving multilingual political discourse analysis. The paper contributes a conceptual and methodological foundation for responsible integration of multilingual reasoning LLMs into computational social science infrastructures.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/02/26, 03:38 PM

# Toward Responsible and Epistemically Grounded Multilingual LLMs for Computational Social Science and Humanities
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00596](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00596)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

Integrating knowledge graphs and multilingual scholarly corpora for domain-adaptive LLMs in SSH

arXiv cs.AI

This paper presents a use case from the European project LLMs4EU and ALT-EDIC infrastructure, focusing on adapting foundation models to Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) research practices by integrating knowledge graphs and multilingual scholarly corpora. The approach aims to support tasks like question answering and literature review while ensuring domain sensitivity and regulatory compliance.

Linguistic Monoculture in LLM-Assisted Language Use

arXiv cs.AI

This paper introduces a mathematical framework to study how reliance on shared LLMs for writing may reduce population-level linguistic diversity, analyzing fixed, recursive, and personalized interaction mechanisms and characterizing equilibria and convergence rates.

Toward LLMs Beyond English-Centric Development

arXiv cs.CL

This paper demonstrates that LLMs are heavily biased toward English, and shows that continual pre-training does not offer cost advantages over training from scratch for adapting models to other languages, especially for cultural understanding.