@LangChain: Read-only agents are easy to branch and test Write access agents that touch production data are still an unsolved eval …
Summary
Read-only agents are easier to test than write-access agents; production data write access remains an unsolved eval problem for many teams.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/10/26, 02:15 PM
Read-only agents are easy to branch and test
Write access agents that touch production data are still an unsolved eval problem for many teams
From the latest Max Agency with @BenTannyhill https://t.co/odo4X1mPXX
Similar Articles
@LangChain: The hardest truth about building agents? You don’t know what they’ll do until they’re in production…
LangChain highlights the unpredictability of agent behavior in production environments, a key challenge for developers.
@LangChain: Giving agents the ability to write code makes them dramatically more capable. It also makes security a lot harder. At L…
LangChain's Deep Agents allow untrusted agent-written code to run securely using WebAssembly-based code interpreters, providing execution and capability isolation without a traditional sandbox.
@LangChain: Agents are writing code, processing files, analyzing data, installing packages, and running multi-step workflows. To do…
LangChain is hosting a technical webinar on July 15 about building a secure execution environment for AI agents, covering security, isolation, and observability.
Anyone here running AI agents that can actually write to production systems?
A user is seeking practical experiences from others running AI agents with write access to production systems, discussing operational challenges like action verification, retry handling, audit trails, and internal ownership.
@LangChain: Improving agents The old way: Manually reading traces, looking for patterns, writing evals, and creating fixes. The bet…
This tweet contrasts the old manual approach to improving AI agents with a new automated method using LangSmith Engine, which cycles through tracing, eval, and fixes.