When your agent calls another company's agent — who actually verifies that handoff?
Summary
A developer describes encountering authentication and authorization gaps when one AI agent calls a third-party vendor's agent, highlighting failure modes like scope escalation, unverified chains, and confused deputy attacks. They ask the community how to handle cross-org agent call verification.
Similar Articles
Don’t let agents verify themselves
The article outlines a rule for autonomous agents where the maker and verifier are separate agents, with a workflow that includes human escalation after verification failures.
Is anyone letting their agents work with agents they didn't build?
A practitioner reflects on the shift from in-house multi-agent setups toward agents collaborating with agents run by third parties, raising questions about discovery, payment, trust, and verification when agents cross operator boundaries.
An agent that can call another agent has already escalated its own privileges
The article discusses how AI agents that can call other agents may lead to privilege escalation beyond reviewed boundaries, highlighting security risks and suggesting better credential scoping in system design.
A 200 from a tool call isn't proof your agent did the thing. How are you verifying actions?
A practitioner shares a pattern where an AI agent's tool call returns success (200/id) but the intended action never actually completed (e.g., email stuck in drafts). They propose read-back verification after every write, labeling actions as verified, acknowledged, or contradicted, and ask how others handle agent action verification.
When your sub-agent calls a real tool, how does the tool know what the human actually authorized?
The author is testing a market-validation for a prototype that provides cryptographically verified authorization evidence in multi-agent tool execution, asking if this addresses a significant production problem for developers.